User talk:Neill Patterson

What's the reason for you editing my stuff? Oh pardon me, I should ask what's the reason for you reverting my stuffing?

Neill Patterson, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Neill Patterson (talk) 19:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, South Asian Canadians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You changed a section of this article to the exact opposite of its original meaning, without even a meaningful edit summary. Take it to the talk page and discuss this edit or leave it alone'' Meters (talk) 22:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, Neill Patterson. I noticed that your recent edit to Australia (continent) added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsfinlayson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oceania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oceania, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

The Oceanian Continental standards
The road is long, don't you tell me to uncuthly to stop my disruptive editing when you don't know what stands for what!!! So please stop your irresponsible actions by riveting my good work Neill Patterson (talk) 11:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Australia (continent). BilCat (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. gadfium 21:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Australia (continent), you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Oceania, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

The continent of Australia-Oceania
Neill Patterson (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The Continent of Australia and Oceania
Do Shut up because it is.

Thank You.

Neill Patterson (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your recent editing history at Oceania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andrewgprout (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Block
You have been blocked from editing for one week due to violating the 3 revert rule. This is probably your last chance here, as I suspect the next block would be indefinite. El_C 22:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, Neill Patterson, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)