User talk:Neiltonks/Archive 1

Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53
Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route 391, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ( talk ) 10:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Desborough
Good work. All more coherent now. Bmcln1 (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I edited your comment at the teahouse
Just to give my the handle that appears in my signature as alt text to the link you made. New editors have been confused by my use of an alt account before, not knowing if I'm MPants at work, MjolnirPants or ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants, so I generally try to use the text that appears in my signature whenever I mention myself. You may, of course, revert if you feel it was inappropriate of me to do that. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  13:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Career edits for Markus Jooste
Thank you for adding dates to my resignation ref about Markus Jooste. How does one remove a BLP/vandalism tag? I see someone tagged it. (I'm new here so advice is appreciated) - I want to do this right without getting penalised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monboddo (talk • contribs) 13:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

You are kind
Please may you stop deleting quality content! It would be greatly appreciated and super kind and caring of you. It would help me to get off my Dorito diet which is currently causing me to die from a zombie apocalypse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.253.184.206 (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Edits on Tennys Sandgren Twitter Controversy
You're a more experienced Wikipedia editor than I. Can you explain why you removed all of the sources linking to Twitter? (Link to diff) Given the nature of the controversy, it seems those are legitimate sources, and it appears that Wikipedia preserves the Tweet text in citations for the case that tweets would be deleted. For example, the fact that Sandgren apologized for at least one of the tweets (by posting another tweet) seems to be a critical piece of information in this scenario.

94KA (talk) 19:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

How can an editor delete important links foolish?
In this article there are number of important supporting links were attached. The fellow editor just delegates all such links and information carelessly. Appreciate to retrieve such information back to the page. Ajithmattam (talk) 08:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: TonyBallioni (talk) 12:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Strange edit
Hi Neiltonks, I'm a little confused about this edit to the Berlin article that you accepted: Special:Diff/868781226/868781356, could you explain? It seems to be a pointless edit that adds a space to the end of a paragraph. Am I missing something? Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 13:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Yoel Adler
Hello, you recently voted in favour of the deletion of Yoel Adler. I just wanted to inform you that this person was not the original subject of the article. The article was completely changed to a non-notable topic the day before it was filed for deletion.

Could you please look at the new arguments put forward on its AfD page, and consider changing your vote for an immediate end of procedure? Emass100 (talk) 15:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Luka Jović
Please beware of accepting revisions such as this on Luka Jović page, since it has pending changes due to persistent vandalism, particularly on that matter – Benfica comes before Benfica B and, since the latter is a reserve team, Jović can still play for it. SLBedit (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Sukhdev Singh Babbar
hi there, thanks for your contributions. Please do not accept edits such as this The content was reliably sourced and the IP was engaging in blanking. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  19:03, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

GOCE 2018 Annual Report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

List of people from Jersey
List of people from Jersey somehow attracts a peculiar vandalism where IP editors add inappropriate names to the list. Thank you for your correction. Can we agree that people on lists just like this one should not be eliminated just because they do not have an article yet, especially if they have been on the list for several years, and even more so if there is a valid inline reference? I work on lists like this one, and I am cautious about your statement about not having an article as a reason for deletion. Reply right here, please.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I was just going by the criteria for inclusion which are stated at the top of the article. Most list articles have these, and in this case it says "This is a list of notable people who were born in the Channel Island of Jersey, or have been resident there", and "All those listed should have an article dedicated to them". So in the case of this list, the consensus is that people should be included only if they have a dedicated article. This is common for this type of list as without it, every person from Jersey who's ever existed could legitimately be added, which would be impractical as the article would become unmanageably long. Wikipedia isn't a catalogue of residents, it's an encyclopaedia. If there are existing entries which don't conform to the criteria, I'm certainly not going to go through and remove them. However it's always possible that some other editor will do so at some point. Neiltonks (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Reverting your edit (kind of, maybe) and talking about it

 * If you disagree with an edit I make, please talk to me about it rather than just reverting. I won't bite!

I think that you "accepted" this wretched pair of edits (adding an intermittently comprehensible screed that I suspect is an attempted autohagiography). Perhaps I misunderstand and you didn't. And if you did, I'm sure that it wasn't deliberate. Anyway, I reverted it. -- Hoary (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You're right, I didn't intend to accept that load of rubbish! I remember it well, and certainly intended to reject the edit. Whether I had a 'senior moment' and consciously clicked the 'accept' button on the Pending Changes screen instead, or whether I did it accidentally and never noticed not getting the confirmation message which accompanies a rejected edit, I'll never know. Anyway, thanks for tidying up my mistake! Neiltonks (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the reversion so amicably. Those particular edits aside, the page Requested articles/Biography/By profession continues to puzzle me. What's it for, really? I suspect that it primarily serves to dissuade some people from writing articles about themselves and members of their family, giving them the illusion that somebody without a COI will do so instead. But I haven't heard of any experienced and competent editor looking through either that page or Requested articles/Biography/By nationality and being prompted by a request there to create an article. A pity, really: On occasion, I've been mildly fascinated by the very little I've known about somebody, presumed that others hereabouts would know a lot more about that person than I did, and wished that one or more of these editors would write an article, if only to satisfy my curiosity. But I doubt that anyone qualified would see my request, surrounded as it would be by hundreds of desperate if often unconvincing pleas for encyclopedia-worthiness. -- Hoary (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ben Canham
Hello Neiltonks. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ben Canham, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims coverage in multiple reliable sources. Thank you. So Why  11:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Hayley Williams
Hey there, I see you have edited Hayley Williams's wiki page recently. I don't know how to make wiki edits, but I was trying to change her status from separated to divorced. The source is her interview this month with l'odet for Midnight Woman, in which she mentions her divorce numerous times as if its old news. Can you make this edit? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.174.172.180 (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Trying to understand removal of content
Hi Neiltonks, Thank you for the welcome. I'm new here, as you note, and included mention of a book about movie production, Below the Line: Anatomy of a Successful Movie. It seemed safe since I'm so new. The book is by a journalist who was inside for the making of the movie Last Vegas. Last Vegas has a wikipedia page, so it seemed a worthy mention. The five actors who starred in the book have pages, as does the director, and it would seem fans would like to know that, too. I posted on the director's page that he was at the center of said book. And it was struck out. If a dynamic encyclopedia has a topic with a page, and that topic becomes the subject of a book, is that not a worthy thing to mention? It was stripped out by one person, who then asked another to explain it as a copyright violation because he was busy and couldn't remember how to cite a copyright violation. Is a book summary a copyright violation? (I have reached out to them with a similar question so really just trying to get an understanding.)  I have noted that the book itself doesn't have a page, so maybe that's an issue? I'm hoping to get insight from you, as well. Thank you. I am new here and want to understand how it works. Ubermoviefan (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Charlize Theron has 1 Daughter and 1 Son
Saying Jackson is Transgender is like saying that I’m Invisible! I’m not, and just because Jackson said that he was a girl, doesn’t mean that he’s actually transgender. He was probably trying to be funny. The kid doesn’t have the ability to say that he’s transgender until he has hit “Puberty”. We need actual evidence to prove that he identifies as Female, otherwise Charlize Theron is a Lair.

(24.114.93.40 (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC))

Alex Smith
Thanks for cleaning up my mistake on Alex Smith, reverted the wrong edit, was just fixing it, but you beat me to it. --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Deanship as fact
As noted the previous time I added it to David Price's article,he has served in Congress longer than any other member of either House from North Carolina.12.144.5.2 (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * When Wikipedia policies are ridiculous,it is necessary that they be constantly complained about rather than complied with.Otherwise you wind up with nothing but a pile of vomit.A court where only hearsay is admissible evidence would embarrass even the most brain-dead kangaroo.12.144.5.2 (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Heanor railway station (Midland Railway)
The photograph illustrating this article is inaccurate. The location is described correctly in the text, but the photograph is of the former railway bridge over Furnace Lane at Loscoe, Derbyshire, approx. 1km NW of the site of Heanor Midland railway station. 92.27.217.137 (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kevin Courtney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGCE ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kevin_Courtney check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kevin_Courtney?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Joseph diGenova
Hi, if you look at the history for Joseph diGenova, you'll see that the repeated removal of "conspiracy theorist" from the lead by multiple IP editors and newly registered editors is one of the reasons that article is protected. unaccepted the pending change you accepted. If you come across that edit again, please revert and direct the editor to the Talk page, thanks! Schazjmd  (talk)  22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Dr Phil
Hi Neiltonks,

There is a topic on the Talk page for the content that you reverted. Please help out by contributing instead of reverting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faffinator (talk • contribs) 13:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Bias in section on "Philosophy and Ethics" in the article on "Artificial Intelligence"
Beliefs of people who definitely have a stake into the technology are cited in the section on "Philosophy and Ethics" of article on "Artificial Intelligence". A balanced approach towards the subject is possibly required by including a section on SCOT. Although, a neutral unbiased viewpoint will be much better. Since, the edit to add a section on SCOT is reverted, I have added a comment on the Talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:4F5:AAE0:40A8:33D9:1160:CF3F (talk) 02:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

National Insurance, Contribution rates employees
Dear Neil

I went to update the section of the National Insurance article this morning in the light of the announcements in the budget yesterday.

I created this section about 5 years ago and have updated each time the new thresholds were announced.

I was disappointed that you had decided to remove the entire section, much of which is a statement of historical fact not easily found elsewhere. Your revision dated 2 Dec 2019 at 13.23

I am intrigued as to why you felt this was appropriate.

Regards 2.24.20.218 (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply - I've restored the section, updated it for 2020-21 and (hopefully) clarified the lower and upper limits issue you raised Regards Alan 2.24.20.218 (talk) 23:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Tan (English actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Elizabeth_Tan_%28English_actress%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Elizabeth_Tan_%28English_actress%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Laura Secord
Hey! I noticed you accepted a revision to Laura Secord that was vandalism. I just wanted to give you a heads up:) -OXYLYPSE (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I’m not sure what happened there! I intended to reject the edit but got the ‘someone else has already done that’ message. When I looked at the history, it said I’d accepted it followed seconds later by your reversion. All I can think is that I accidentally tapped both the Accept and Reject buttons or something (I’m on an iPad). Anyway, thanks for tidying up. Neiltonks (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, technology eh - No worries:) -OXYLYPSE (talk) 18:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Have you considered archiving this talk page?
Hello, and thanks for reverting that test edit. I clicked on your talk page link, and there's quite a lot of topics on it. Have you considered archiving, or is there a reason for not? Just curious {! Thanoscar21talk, contribs 21:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Non-reliable source
Neil, to your Peter Hitchens reversions, we agree 1,000% the Daily Mail is not a reliable source, but this is referencing Peter's articles, as that is where the quotes are from. His anti-vaxxer content exists and should not be censored (even if we consider it to be daft). Putting back the anti-vaxxer section now. Men2ge4zhong3 (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

help? (Editing Dan Gibson (author))
Thanks for over 12 years of service!!!

I visit Wiki at least 10 times a week if not more but i never changed anything or looked at the back-end of the site. And to be honest... i have no ff-ing clue how it all works.. It took me an hour just to find out how to report / ask for help on an article..

And i saw you replied! but... i have no clue what to do now. I have seen Dan's documentary and it is pretty good and persuasive, but i do not know Dan.. should i ask him to write his own page? Or should an older version of the page be restored?

i think a lot of Muslim fundamentalists will want to change it every time it is corrected..

hope i am doing it good... 14:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)~ 19-aug-2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiko Rover (talk • contribs) 14:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Can you help?
I have a small blog. 36 followers on twitter. I have a passion for what I do. But that Wikipedia guy is ruining it by copying all my stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesoccerdagger (talk • contribs) 23:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

maradona
Why do you keep changing my edits? 2A00:23C6:A58C:FC01:D83B:3FE:845A:4305 (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Because your edits are all vandalism Neiltonks (talk) 22:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

They aren’t. Will you stop changing my edits please 2A00:23C6:A58C:FC01:D83B:3FE:845A:4305 (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Shah Wali Taranasaz
Hello my friend. I hope you are fine. You requested a speedy deletion on Shah Wali Taranasaz. It was a very appropriate request. The article was both insubstantial and unreferenced. I have addressed these issues, I think, and removed the request template. I’ll be very grateful if you will please take a look and tell me if it’s now ok. Thank you very kindly. Best wishes, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 06:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Uber
"Unexplained edit" isn't grounds for undoing an edit. If that rationale was adequate, we'd have a bot do it. You actually have to look at the edit and see if it lacks merit. Interestingly enough, the editor did in fact explain their edit and was simply reverting a bot that their edit falsely triggered. Please take more care with your reversions in the future. Rklawton (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Reversion of the edit on Scorsese's page
I've made a minor edit on Scorsese's page, as the date was referenced incorrectly. I'd encourage you to check the reference for yourself Gorillazlive (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit acceptance
Hi Neiltonks,

I saw that you accepted an IP edit for the Criticism of Sikhism article. The protection that the page has for new and unregistered users is a result of my request for such back in September, for that precise edit. It is periodically reinstated by a user who is very likely using a variety of IP socks, refuses to discuss his proposed edits as advised by multiple users, has been reverted by multiple users, has engaged in edit war behavior, engages in bad faith, and has possibly been at this for years, not months. I wouldn't want to draw you in any conflict, as low-intensity as it may be, but I'm not sure that clearing that edit is advisable, as it is the sole reason for the protection that was seen fit to be given to that page. Thanks, Sapedder (talk) 12:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

your last revison
Sorry, but none of these sources are reliable, and with dark web stuff we need to be especially careful. please provide independent, reliable, secondary sources (no user-generated content) for these claims. the only reliable sources cited predate the relaunch, so don't verify any of the new material

can you go in detail about "no user_gen content' ?

also this part is false we used bleeping computer and a few other top teir hacker websites that for this .https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/notorious-alphabay-darknet-market-comes-back-to-life/

everything we have documented is legitimate, we have no idea what you mean or rejected the new info. +
 * I think you believe that I reverted your recent edits to AlphaBay. I didn't, they were reverted by an editor called 'Rhododendrites' so you need to post to their talk page if you want to query the reversion. I'm mentioned in the edit history because I happened to be the person who made the edit prior to yours so when your edits were reverted, it was the version created by my edit which was restored. I have no view on the notability or otherwise of the sources you quoted - I know nothing about the dark web so I'm not in a position to decide one way or the other. Neiltonks (talk) 11:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Jamie Lynn Spears
Hello Neiltonks-

I’m the author of the Jamie Lynn spears edit that just got canned-I’m writing now just to try and fill you in on the particulars of the situation, which objectively make it hard to argue against the edit’s inclusion.

The edit as written absolutely had to do with her-the entire reason i put it there is she’s spent the last few days as one of the most talked about public figures across social media for lying in both the book she’s releasing next week and the media blitz she’s been on to join up publicity for its release. Also, beyond the current interest in jamie Lynn, her family is one of the most newsworthy in America not just now but in perpetuity…..the material in the edit is a condensed and sourced aggregation of what literally millions have either publicly weighed in on or closely followed in the last week. The three sentences about her husband were integral to explaining a currently unfolding event of some public significance that is sure to only grow wider in the immediate 1-2 weeks. Nobody cares about her husband’s work background, they care that the facts as listed in the ad it would make it seem as if Jamie Lynn was being intentionally deceptive, at a time when she’s faced other allegations of improprieties and dishonesty regarding her sister (Britney) and the legal wrangling over Britney’s conservatorship. Trust me here, this is not an issue that I personally care about but I literally know dozens if not hundreds of women from age 18ish to 60 that are obsessed with all of it. I get the sense that you shut down the edit because you aren’t particularly familiar with this situation, it’s present Notoriety, or why it’s relevant. A cursory search on Google can you show you how many news articles have been written about the spears family even in the last month-their family dynamic is probably the most widely followed situation in American pop culture as of right now. And to just once again make it clear, what I put in the ad it was relevant, deeply so, not because anybody cares about the husbands history, but because the actual record of that history creates the impression (for some) that Jamie Lynn lied to try and gain shared prestige, which regardless of opinion is considered news. It would be malpractice not to address this on Jamie Lynn’s Wiki.

Best,

P

Ppol7324 (talk) 12:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Daniele Archibugi's birthdate...
Hello Neiltonks, it's not that I'm making up missing birthdates, to then feed them to Wikipedia. However if the most relieable source is in pdf format, I just don't know how to do it. Otherwise I would have re-added the date and this link: http://www.danielearchibugi.org/downloads/papers/2017/11/Archibugi-CV-September-2017.pdf As my main realm is german wikipedia I apologize for not being able to get it right. It kind of surprised me though, that now even birthdates require a source, as only a few of the older birthdates have one. Best, Llydia (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!
You da Goat no cap! I appreciate the changes you made to Ghosty (producer)'s article!

XR98 (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 

Pending changes
Hey, I noticed that you accepted this edit to Persona 5. Thing is, that shouldn't have been allowed; it cites a post on the app Amino, which is a self-published social media source. Just want to let you know, thanks. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  01:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks for letting me know - I missed the "/blog/" embedded in the URL, if I'd seen that I'd probably have rejected the edit. Neiltonks (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
 Baffle☿gab  03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Revert of edit regarding stripper uniforms
I was wondering why you felt that the edit and external link were inappropriate. I believe the additional content expands the information on outfits worn by UK strippers. I appreciate that I have used my site as as the cited source however we employ strippers and regularly send them out on jobs and the article is based upon our industry experience and knowledge. It is a well known fact that strippers attending parties in the UK will often be asked to wear unforms however this is not addressed in the current content. Possibly you would give opinion on whether or not you feel this article would be worthy of citation and could also add to the knowledge base. https://www.hunksandhoneys.co.uk/strippers-female/female-stripper-earnings or does the fact that the article appears on a stripper hire site automatically exclude our website from being cited? Max Strip (talk) 12:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The website being commercial doesn't automatically prevent it being cited on Wikipedia but it does make it more difficult because Wikipedia policy prevents the encyclopaedia being used for sales or promotion. In this case, I thought the sales aspects of the website were just too prominent for it to be used. Neiltonks (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

List of British Airways destinations unsourced changes
Please do not accept unsourced changes in articles that are pending changes protected, like you did. The supporting source does not mention a seasonal service. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
 * rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png
 * rowspan="2" |
 * style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)