User talk:NekoKatsun/Archive 2

2022 invasion
Please look at talk page. It was removed because it wasn’t cited and was a comma splice to boot. If you disagree with moving it to a daughter page there is a section there to stay so. But if you want it to stay in this article it needs to be cited Elinruby (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Each country in that sentence has a source after it - eight total sources for a single sentence. Even for a current event that's more than sufficient. If you have an issue with the sentence's grammar, please correct it instead of chopping the end of the sentence off and leaving the rest of it hanging. I note that on the talkpage you admit you haven't reviewed the sources; please do so, you'll see that even a quick glance is enough to confirm their content. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 21:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Ok, look. Did you see on the talk page where I said i had seen exactly that kind of post? But this is still emotionally charged language that should itself be cited, even if the front half is if anything over cited. But don’t worry. I have no intention of trashing all that work. But they are trying to slim the article down to a summary article, and I am looking over the current text as a prelude to that. Are most of these reactions on social media? Because I don’t think there is an article about social media in this war yet, but maybe there should be. Russian information war against Ukraine gets into this a little, but mainly in terms of Russia and Ukraine. Meanwhile the comma splice part just means that a comma is linking two sentences where there really should be a period. I don’t doubt the truth of any of that sentence; I am just saying that the last part of that sentence needs to be cited. And maybe we should expand that thought instead of trying to shoehorn it all into one sentence. LMK. Elinruby (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * so I looked again and see your point now. Nonetheless, if we are trying to move stuff off, this strikes me as something that could potentially become its own article, but if this is your work I would prefer to do it with your input. I will check back about this in a day or so Elinruby (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not necessarily my work; I simply saw that the sentence had been truncated without removing a list of countries, so I tidied it up - I mostly just fix typos or incomplete edits like this one. If consensus is for a new article, then by all means, it's fine with me! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 18:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Well it’s been discussed on the talk page. I will check again before doing anything major. So far I have been doing a trim for wordiness. That one sentence caught my eye because of all the citations, but you are right, the last three sets of references refer to something different than the first ones, and the part I cut was the predicate for that clause. Anyway, I am an inclusionist and the sources are really good, so they will be used somewhere, no question. Thanks for the civil discussion. Elinruby (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

American Airlines Flight 191
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jonchache (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: being horny!!! 199.170.132.3 (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I... what? XD Well this has given me a much needed laugh today, I suppose! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 17:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * hehehehehehehehe 199.170.132.3 (talk) 02:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Just an aside...
when I first started work on that List, THIS is what it looked like. So I've put in over ten years of work on it, bringing it from an unreferenced mess to a Featured List. I just can't deal with that certain editor right now...will be stepping away from it for a bit, maybe a day or a week, I dunno. Thanks though - Shearonink (talk) 07:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh my goshhhhh, HUGE respect for the amount of work you put in getting it to where it is today! Take all the time you need; I'll keep an eye on things and see if I can keep the conversation going and see what our friend is ultimately looking for. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 17:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Wish me luck, I'm diving back in. Wonder what happened to the Seacactus 13 editor... Shearonink (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

He's back
Smirk. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh no!!! Also I just love how the account was created in Oct '22, claims to be a member of four different projects/teams, and yet has exactly three edits in mainspace unrelated to Zak Smith (21 edits to their userpage, a mainspace edit about Smith, and six total on your talkpage and at the COI noticeboard). I suspect there is indeed a COI here, but I sure don't think it's you!
 * Also lol I was just about to ask if it was too early to report it based on WP:DUCK and then I looked at your contribs and say you already had. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 15:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

saw x
hello neko my name is reedjekins iam the one who put that edit on the saw x wiki that you removed iam not trying to be rude with what iam about to say but that edit is true i just dont know how to put sources on https://sawfilms.fandom.com/wiki/%22Custodian%22 if you check this link it should verify my edit thank you reading this Reedjenkins1234 (talk) 17:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for stopping by! Unfortunately, fandom sites, and other site with user-generated content, are not reliable sources, and should not be used on Wikipedia. If you look at the sources for the other actors on the Saw X page, you'll see what I mean. If you have a reliable source, we can absolutely add it, but until then it should not be on the page. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 18:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks for telling me Reedjenkins1234 (talk) 18:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)