User talk:NekoNekoTeacher

Hi
I have just found that someone had added the sentence Goryeo army was annihilated two times by Japan, but I couldn't find the source. And you added some comment about that. So, can you give me the source about the defeat of allied army of Mogol and Goryeo by Japan? I prefer to primary source --Hairwizard91 16:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I wish to express my gratitude for your answer. I confirm it. Is it the first information that you hopes? record of South Korea, record of China, and Record of Japan,　Which do you want?

Let's discuss it. Please divide your knowledge into me. --NekoNekoTeacher 13:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The record of Goryeo says that Mongol and Goryeo attacked Japan, but failed because of heaven storm. But, you said that the allied army is defeated by Japan. So, I want to see the primary source about the defeat by Japan. --Hairwizard91 13:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Information for which you hope is being written in "Record of Goryeo". Volume 19 of the history book on this South Korea is recorded. Mongolia and Goeryo were not able to landing on Kyushu because Japan had defended in the Dazaifu. When Mongolia began withdrawing to replenish water, the typhoon attacked it them. As a result, a Mongolian army was annihilated.
 * Write the Chinese character in here about that. I could not find it. I have already said that it is failed by heavy storm. --Hairwizard91 13:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your response was very early. Did you seriously read the source? Please read the source again. And, please do a more advanced answer. Your answer proves your history knowledge.


 * I presume that you did not read it very carefully becase you are totally wrong. See!! What you said is wrong because volume 19 is the period of 明宗 from 1170 to 1197. Do you know when Mongol attacked Korea? haha. it is about 100 years later. --Hairwizard91 13:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Write the Primary source as Chinese character here
Write directly the chinese character in here if you want to say that the mongol and korea were defeated by Japan. There is no such a sentence in record of Goryeo. I also welcome to read the Japanese source 日本書紀. You shall not find any source that Japan defeated the allied army of Mongol and Korea. --Hairwizard91 13:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You are correct. Certainly, information on Mongol will not be able to be found to Nihonshoki.　Your Japanese knowledge is very low. --NekoNekoTeacher 14:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What I mean is that... I want to see the primary source saying that the allied army of Mongol and Goryeo were defeated by Japan. Where did you find it ?--Hairwizard91 14:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I referred to the article on Mongol invasions of Japan of Wikipedia. Could you teach the source that Mongolia and Allied Forces of goeryo won Japan? --NekoNekoTeacher 14:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Again. Write here the 日本書紀 or 高麗史
Write the Chinese character saying that Mongol and Korean were defeated by Japan. What these sentences are based on ???? Where did you find them ? ''Mongolia and Goeryo were not able to landing on Kyushu because Japan had defended in the Dazaifu. When Mongolia began withdrawing to replenish water, the typhoon attacked it them. As a result, a Mongolian army was annihilated.''--Hairwizard91 14:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Source of 高麗史
高麗史 volume 23-25 --Hairwizard91 14:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Wonjong of Goryeo is dead in 1974. Do you know when Mongol attacked Japan? hahaha. Why is there a record there though it became Japan and a war after he dies?　--NekoNekoTeacher 14:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * See 25th king Chungryeol. --Hairwizard91 14:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Haha 25th king is not included in the above link sorry.

, , 
 * It is too long right?--Hairwizard91 14:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, The source was found by your cooperation. Thank you.

Source of 高麗史

 * 1) 高麗史26卷-世家26-元宗2-10-29-1269,

甲子蒙古使于婁大于　等六人偕倭人來　出迎于郊初申思佺與倭人謁帝帝大喜曰: "爾國王祗　朕命使爾等往日本爾等不以險阻爲辭入不測之地生還復命忠節可嘉." 厚賜匹帛以至從卒又謂倭人曰: "爾國朝覲中國其來尙矣今朕欲爾國之來朝非以逼汝也但欲垂名於後耳." 賚予甚稠　令觀覽宮殿旣而倭人奏云: "臣等聞有天堂佛刹正謂是也." 帝悅又使　觀燕京萬壽山玉殿與諸城闕.


 * 1) 高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-08-30-1282,

蠻軍摠把沈聰等六人自日本逃來言: "本明州人至元十八年六月十八日從葛刺　萬戶上船至日本値惡風船敗. 衆軍十三四萬同　一山十月初八日日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之." 王遣上將軍印侯郞將柳庇押聰等送于元.

Please let me hear your impression. --NekoNekoTeacher 15:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah... It is natural that some of the total army is defeated. But, you said that the entire army is defeated by Japan. --Hairwizard91 15:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * In addition, I am not sure they are actually the army who attacked Japan. the number of soldiers are 130,000~140,000. It is larger than the entire army who attacked Japan.


 * The anwer is here. When is it 至元十八年? I do not know when 至元十八年 is. Do you know?


 * Moreover, who is he, 蠻軍. It is usually said the barbarian who lived in the south of China. --Hairwizard91 15:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Let's discuss it by the same rule as me. Please write the source that proves your　insistence. And, please write Mongol invasions of Japan on which yours insists. Please let me hear the impression to this information. How did you understand the meaning of this Chinese character? 日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之--NekoNekoTeacher 15:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * See when it is... It is one year later after the war ends. Moreover, the army is not allied soldier of Korean and Mongol. They are 蠻軍. Japan just kill 蠻軍. You may know the meaning of 蠻. They are barbarian who live southern area from China. --Hairwizard91 16:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Where in "Japan just kill 蠻 army" source is this being written?　Moreover, 蠻 is not being written the barbarian. Are you insisting on the episode not being written in the source?--NekoNekoTeacher 16:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey. You have no ability to translate chinese character. See what you have already cited.

"#高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-08-30-1282,


 * 蠻軍摠把沈聰等六人自日本逃來言: "本明州人至元十八年六月十八日從葛刺　萬戶上船至日本値惡風船敗. 衆軍十三四萬同　一山十月初八日日本軍至我軍飢不能戰皆降日本擇留工匠及知田者餘皆殺之." 王遣上將軍印侯郞將柳庇押聰等送于元."
 * Do you want me to translate the above sentence into english??
 * Yes. Please translate with this document. #高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-06-63-1280 茶丘　都率蒙麗漢四萬軍發合浦范文虎率蠻軍十萬發江南俱會日本--NekoNekoTeacher 16:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Violating 3RR rule
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's WP:3RR rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Hairwizard91 16:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

=Barbarian in south of China== See this article Han_chauvinism.
 * You understand completely by mistake. Please translate Please translate with this document. #高麗史29卷-世家29-忠烈王2-06-63-1280 茶丘　都率蒙麗漢四萬軍發合浦范文虎率蠻軍十萬發江南俱會日本--NekoNekoTeacher 16:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You may be right. I need to research or study the war again. Thanks. --Hairwizard91 17:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
It is very pleasure to know you. I want you to teach me if there is distorting history related to Korea, Japan and China. About the war of Mongol and Japan, you must be right. --Hairwizard91 18:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I am glad to meet the you who loves history of China.
 * I keep demanding. Please write your correct history. Perhaps, I can point out your mistake. And, will you still end the translation of Chinese?　--NekoNekoTeacher 10:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I have already said you may right about the war, but you need reputable published literature in order to add to the wiki article. --Hairwizard91 16:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Revert warring
Please stop the revert warring and sockpuppetry with anonymous IP address. You have apparently already violated WP:3RR at Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Japanese propaganda tool. Korealist 19:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * There is a discussion in the talk page for Toyotomi Hideyoshi regarding the military leaders who opposed him during the invasion of the mainland near the end of his rule. If you have some substantial reason for the edits you've made other than the comment made in the edit summary of that page please chime in. Geeman 04:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

re: your request
Hi I'm willing to act as a mediator to your discussions with User:Room218 about article content, what I suggest is an informal approach utilising a user subpage say User:Gnangarra/Kofun disputed content. we can create a similar page for each article. Gnangarra 13:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)