User talk:NellieBly/Archive 2

Barnstar!


The company provides no reference for the information and as a researcher I see that as an implicit failure of fact. I agree that vandalism is not necessarily the right approach but it is the most effective approach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.73.160.27 (talk) 13:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Plagiarism
I have removed a section here. It is visible in the page history. --NellieBly (talk) 12:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Bialystok
Thanks very much for pointing that out, NellieBly! I really appreciate that. Wyklety (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Please make test edits in a sandbox or on your userpage, not on the main page
Greetings, saw your edits on Bagpipes. Note that every single edit is cataloged, so "test" edits just clutter up the edit history. Plus each edit you make pops up on everyone's Watchlist, which we use to monitor for vandalism. Please do test edits on the Sandbox or on your userpage. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi there!
Hello, just wanted to let you know that in the past 10 minutes, you beat me to a ton of reverts on the recent changes list! Hehe. Keep up the great work! The Arbiter  ★★★  02:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Fag enabler
Why wasn't I contacted before Fag enabler was deleted? Proxima Centauri (talk) 07:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Hands of Perón
Please see the discussion I initiated at this page. Thanks! LargoLarry (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Here, eat this
For heroic and ultrafast and superawesome rapid reverts of nasty vandalism on my talk page, you win a...



Ginsengbomb has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the assist! :) Ginsengbomb (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Groping
You may wish to keep an eye on the article. The anon. IP is back. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * WTF? I am trying to make the article more balanced. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 07:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I see you are watching still nevermind. Cheers!! - 4twenty42o (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I resent your loose slinging of "vandalism". Excuse you! Fixing the header levels and geographic description is vandalism? Pakistan and Bangladesh are not India, read the paragraph and watch what you say. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 07:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and sorry for jumping down your throat. I thought those edits looked weird, but valid enough I didn't think to remove them, just change them. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

accusations
Please do not accuse me of vandalism, or go to other user's pages and say that my IP is known for vandalism. Thanks 119.173.81.176 (talk) 08:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your quick work in fighting vandalism is appreciated.

 * Same here. Thanks, Garion96 (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Here as well. Congrats on undoing 173.169.163.132's edits before I could, and asking for him to be banned before I even got to the admin page! Axeman89 (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Del Pino
I have answered the things about the viceroy at the article talk page, it should be better to keep the talking there.

As for Evita and Peron, yes, there was (and probably is) some people that worships them. However, it's not an uncommon situation: many other people loved by poor clases receive similar treatment after their deaths. Popular singers like Gilda or Rodrigo also have their shrines. The point is that, even if such thing took place, it isn't a phenomenon big enough as to influence the real political life of the country. MBelgrano (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for you for the nice welcome and reply to me. I asked about adding a picture to the Joe Pepitone page. If I can't use a picture of his baseball card that is posted some place online could I take a picture self of an old Joe Pepitone baseball card and use that? Thanks .... Matt on Cape Cod —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.228.175 (talk) 23:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. For the Arbitration Committee, Risker (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Apology
I'm sorry, NellieBly. I didn't know what I was doing. I was bored. Let's be noraml and don't delete this, okay? Thanks. 115.128.52.10 (talk) 09:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Kalpesh dave
Hi, unless I'm missing something Kalpesh dave was blanked by an IP, not by the author.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 10:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

thanks
Thank you for following through. Collect (talk) 23:58, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Ngo Dinh Diem presidential visit to Australia
Most welcome. Looks like a sort of 4chan attack - Peripitus (Talk) 02:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback alert
ConCompS (Talk to me) 02:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Re my talk page
Please make sure you post your warnings on the correct talk pages. If you check the diffs I was reverting the same thing you were reverting and something strange happened (we probably pressed the button at the same time). I will therefore delete your warning. by hajatvrc at 07:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Huggle Errors
I noticed with this edit, you commented that the problem was not with Huggle. What is causing the errors? Whatever the cause, it is preventing Huggle from filing reports with AIV. Thanks! — Spike Toronto  08:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * P.S. Please respond here. I will have your talk page watchlisted. Thanks! — Spike Toronto  08:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm also having problems with Popups, which has nothing to do with Huggle. User:Suffusion of Yellow thinks it's a problem with the API, which will affect both. It makes sense, because Huggle hasn't changed: it's still the same program on my computer. It has to be what Huggle is working with, which is the API. The fact that Popups is also experiencing errors means that either the API has been modified (and in that case we'll need a new build of both Huggle and Popups, which is not exactly a bug per se) or there's some kind of error happening with the API. Either way it's not Huggle that's the root of the problem, as far as I can tell. --NellieBly (talk) 08:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Nelly... you were a bit too quick for me...still busy adding new ref's to the page. But thanks for keeping an aeye! They're all correct now. Best JP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jp keijzer (talk • contribs) 08:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Nellie! Once I read today at the feedback page that the problem was with the API, I understood that that meant, as you say, that the problem is not with Huggle, but with that with which it is working. One of the worst things was that it could not retrieve user contribs for filing reports with AIV, which meant that we had to do it manually. Also, it would sometimes start warnings over at Level 1 rather than escalating from the previous warning; this seemed to be especially the case if the previous warning was left by Twinkle. Finally, today (Friday), I was still getting errors, particularly (and I paraphrase), "Could not revert. Invalid token." Whatever a "token" is! Thanks for the explanation! — Spike Toronto  07:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Suicide threats
Howdy NellieBly. I'll resepct your request, but (in future) be a little less emotional, please. GoodDay (talk) 14:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)