User talk:Nelsito Maduro

July 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Marv, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * "did not appear to be constructive" - this is a strong statement and you hold the obligation to prove with scientific sources - under what circumstances it "did not appear to be constructive". Nelsito Maduro (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should follow your own advise first. You're the one altering sourced info and adding unsourced info. You also clearly tried to hide the word "Iran/Persian", changing a link that worked to a red one. This is what Savory says "In November 1510, Ismāīl marched into Khurāsān, and on 2 December succeeded in luring the Ozbegs, who had taken refuge behind the walls of Marv, into a pitched battle. Muhammad Shibani Khan and 10,000 of his men were killed." Where do you see mention of 2,000 killed? HistoryofIran (talk) 17:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * How come could Uzbeks invade "Safavid region of Khurasan" in 1507 if Safavids never stepped on Khurasan soil until 1510? Where is your logic?!
 * How come "outnumbering Uzbek army" would hide behind the walls?! Where is the logic here?!
 * Where is the logic in 10,000 Uzbek victims while Merv Castle could not accommodate more than 5000 garrison in the early 1500s?! Nelsito Maduro (talk) 21:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You're contradicting yourself, what happened to "you hold the obligation to prove with scientific sources", I guess you're an exception? Sorry, but your opinion is irrelevant. In Wikipedia, we follow WP:RS, not our personal opinions. If you keep adding unsourced info / removing/altering sourced info, I will report you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Kindly answer the questions! Thanks Nelsito Maduro (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Why can't you check the authenticity of the indicated sources? I downloaded the books and opened the indicated pages, but there is no information indicated in this particular wikipedia page. If you are not able to check the source, then kindly find more suitable job for yourself. Nelsito Maduro (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You're either being dishonest or can't read a single page properly. Considering your comment up above ("Where is the logic here?!"), I think the former. Here, everyone can see that you're wrong. https://archive.org/details/savory-1980-safavids/page/35/mode/2up HistoryofIran (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Look and read what is written: "The Battle of Merv occurred on 2 December 1510 as a result of the Uzbek invasion of the Khorasan region of Safavid Persia" and now go to the link and read and try to find where it confirms this illogical statement! How come could this battle happen as a result of Uzbek invasion if the Safavids came to emerge just three years ago and the Khurasan region has never been part of Safavids until 1510. Read your book and there is nothing about this.
 * About 10,000 victims, the author has brought no reference for these numbers! No reference! Why don't you ask a simple question: How come could Safavids kill 10,000 Uzbeks if the Merv Castle could not acommodate more than 3000 garrison in the early 1500s? I don't see any logic in the way you think! Nelsito Maduro (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You’re not a historian, thus your opinion/claim on the event is irrelevant, and so is mine. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * kindly, answer the questions you were asked Nelsito Maduro (talk) 15:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:IDHT. Feel free to read my comments here again. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)