User talk:Nelu555

Welcome!
Hello, Nelu555, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Outline
Title: Laminoplasty

Subtopics:

History
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29173422

Anatomy of the spine

Why it is performed
 * Symptoms
 * Medical uses
 * Diagnostic tests

Method/Technique
 * Cervical Laminoplasty: A Review of Indications, Technique and Outcomes.
 * http://0-eds.b.ebscohost.com.libus.csd.mu.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=360b4314-8a3d-4f86-bfdc-a92cf1a89a40@pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU=#AN=126479039&db=c8h

Risks/Complications/Contra-indications
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21434824
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407090
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407090

Recovery or Rehabilitation

Success Rates
 * http://thejns.org/doi/pdfplus/10.3171/foc.1998.4.5.1

Your contributed article, Nelu555/sandbox


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nelu555/sandbox. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Laminoplasty. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Laminoplasty. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. If you want to WP:MOVE your sandbox content to the mainspace, please remember to change the name of the article so that you do not create a mainspace article named after your sandbox. Also, if the article already exists in Wikipedia's mainspace (as Laminoplasty does), then please either just add your sandbox content directly to that article (with attribution in the edit summary or talk page to any other editors who contributed to that sandbox content) or you can request a WP:HISTMERGE to merge the page histories. Please be careful not to create a duplicate article under a meaningless name like Nelu555/sandbox. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Primary Article Review
Hello,

I thought this was a very well written article with very helpful and well placed images. The only thing I would say is that I don't think that citation number four is a secondary source, so I don't know if you can keep that information in the article. Overall great job though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wheatona22 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)