User talk:Nemaja

Welcome!
Hello, Nemaja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Uncletomwood (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Thank you for the warm welcome! David has given me some tips about my first entry, and I will also visit the pages you recommended. Thank you for the information, Uncletomwood Nemaja (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek)


A tag has been placed on E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, not out of concerns about notability, but because it was excessively promotional. You need to rewrite it, avoiding adjectives and statements of how good his music is or how important he is culturally. Let the facts of his career show it. Remember to document the career by references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Any language will do, but in not English, provide a translation of a key sentence.  DGG ( talk ) 22:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I understand, thank you for the feedback and advice! I will rewrite it and post the new article soon. Kind regards, Nemaja (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Remaining major problems:

1. Every statement of fact has to be referenced; if you want to say its the longest running commercial, you need a source for that.

2. Notability depends on whether the reviews are substantial. I haven't checked yet, since it require registering. The mere fact of performances or even recordings does not make for notability.  DGG ( talk ) 04:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

So regarding the first point it would be better to say, for example "This commercial is still aired every Friday since its release" if no source is found? Most references consist of articles written in our national newspaper "De Ware Tijd van Suriname" (roughly translated: The True Time of Suriname) and are from the archive. Nemaja (talk) 12:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/E.A.S. (Emanuel Scheek) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)