User talk:Nemerson4970/No Child Left Behind Act/Emily J. L. Peer Review

Peer review:

The new content added appears to be relevant. The Legislative History section is greatly improved. I also like the section that outlines each title of the act. I know it’s a lot to add, but I think it’s important. The supporters/opponents section is really interesting and is not something I have seen included in Wikipedia pages before (but seems like an important addition); I may consider adding something similar to my article!

All sources appear to be functioning. They also all seem to be reliable, except that I haven’t heard of source 7 before (www.ideapartnership.org). I’m not saying it’s not reliable necessarily, but I’m just not familiar with it. It may be better to replace that one, possibly by citing the law itself.

Overall, all new content seems well-written and definitely relevant. Looks great! (PS I’m kind of confused about where I’m supposed to post this, I hope this is right!) Emily J. L. (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)