User talk:Nemesis900

Nomination of Hans Grande for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans Grande is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hans Grande until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e deckertalk 12:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, since you're new here I figured I'd drop by and try and give you an explanation with a little less legalese. Wikipedia's policies about when to have an article about a subject largely are based on the guideline we call our general notability guideline.  ROughly speaking, articles on new subjects should be based on two or more reliable, third-party sources (things like newspapers, magazines, books, things that have gone through an editorial process.   Occasionally high-end blogs meet this, but few blogs have a whole editorial system.)  Press releases, the person's web site, their Facebook, Twitter, etc., are self-published and don't help.  I looked and I didn't see those sources, this was one of the concerns that led to a previous version of this article being deleted.  If you can provide those sources, that's great, please improve the article with them, and then make a comment at Articles for deletion/Hans Grande.  If you need any help. please drop a line on my Talk page, I'll be glad to help if I can.  --j⚛e deckertalk 13:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)