User talk:Nenifled

It-wit
A tag has been placed on It-wit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of It-wit and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Matty - (Talk) 11:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, add the  tag to the article, not your talk page. Please remember to add why the article should be kept on the talk page. Thank you, Matty - (Talk) 11:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

From It-wit talk page
Hello I am just describing my compagny. I dont think that I am advertising.

"Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion"
 * Sorry, I added the wrong tag. Please read WP:CSD along with the inclusion guidelines for comapnies. Please also note that editing articles about things you are involved with is strongly discouraged. If your company is notable, at some point in time someone unrelated will start an article on it. Thank you. Matty - (Talk) 11:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Also remember to sign your posts with 4 tidles { ~ ), it makes following conversations easier and helps people understand who said what. Thank you, Matty - (Talk) 11:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, looks like I didn't clarify that we only sign on talk pages. Articles are a collaborative effort, and are attributed to a group of editors (not just one) so we don't sign them. Sorry. Matty - (Talk) 11:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Dont be sorry - this is only my second page, so it is probably me who has to say sorry. There is a lot to read about notability... hope that I can describe It-wit in a neutral way, it should be possible. nenifled (talk) 11:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC) Do you think that a small compagny can be described on wikipedia? nenifled (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No no, it was my fault. You were following my advice and I didn't make it clear. You didn't make a mistake. It doesn't have much to do with the size of the company but whether they have recieved relevant and widespread press coverage of either their actions or something that makes them worthy for inclusion on an encyclopedia. I'm willing to help - is there any coverage from unrelated sources on your company? There is alot to read, however its really the lead paragraph that says it all - it can be considered notable (in the "appropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia" meaning of the word) if it is the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Matty - (Talk) 11:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Someone else deleted my page ;-) Can you still see this "talk" And will you still help me? nenifled (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am still willing to help. I have watched your talk page so i'll be notified when you leave a message. Does your company have any reliable sources to establish any notability? If not - i'm afraid I might not be able to help you. If you can find anything on WP:CORP or WP:NOTE that your company falls under any of the criteria there then it is possible to re-create the article. Matty (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank You, I am not sure if we have enough notabilty - IBM is describing our compagny on this page: Business Partner and we have been in the newspaper. We have also some partners that have links to our homepage? Is that enough? nenifled (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Ave Point and Boersen also mentioned our compagny:
 * Børsen Gazelle
 * Business Partner
 * Gyldendal
 * ProActive
 * CRN
 * Coaching
 * Gazelle 2008

nenifled (talk) 13:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)