User talk:Nenolod


 * Archive (January - July 2007): User talk:Nenolod/Archive-July2007

Unspecified source for Image:Sigpaw.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Sigpaw.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 12:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The image was in the public domain, but is indeed not useful to the content of the encyclopedia. I'm glad that it got deleted, as I was only using it when Images were allowed in sigs. ;) --nenolod (talk) (edits) 05:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Confederate History Month
Could you please direct me to where I *could* find the soapbox for the tea party? :-)

I tried to find the most recent non-teabagged revision that was relatively NPOV but I couldn't. I think I might have a stroke if I read through any more of that page's history. So I requested page protection to at least get the anonymous klansmen to stop. Janus303 (talk) 04:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification


The article Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software interface, unreferenced since March 2009. Nothing significant on google.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. When you recently edited Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SASL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)