User talk:Nenor96

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinisa Berjan (February 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sinisa Berjan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sinisa_Berjan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sinisa_Berjan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  16:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Qcne, I have reviewed help articles and honestly I am not quite sure what should I do regarding reliable sources. Not sure what do you need and how to implement on my side (I am supposing in the editor). I wrote this article for my uncle therefore I have first-hand source informatons and I get him involved if needed to send any paper work/documentation for his acomplishes. Please let me know if you can what should be my next steps as my uncle would really love to have his own wiki page :) Nenor96 (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi there @Nenor96.
 * A fundamental policy of Wikipedia is that every single piece of information must be verified by a published source. This is a hard requirement. You need to look at your draft and ask questions from the point of view of someone who does not know your Uncle:
 * - How can they confirm he was born in 1979 in Sarajevo? His education? His ambassadorialship? The languages he speaks?
 * Readers of an article do not have access to your Uncle nor any personal documentation that he may have. They certainly don't have access to your first-hand sources! You therefore need to have published sources that confirm all this information. If the published sources do not exist (for example, we can't accept a birth certificate to verify his date of birth, as it is not reasonable for every reader of the article to access this certificate!) then the information must be removed - even if it is true.
 * The next thing you need to ask yourself is if your uncle actually qualifies for a Wikipedia article. The relevant guidance is at WP:NPEOPLE. I actually think he does qualify as Ambassador, but it is still worth reading that guidance page.
 * There's some language in the draft that needs tightening up, such as "rich academic career": we call this peacock language as it's only purpose is to flatter and promote the subject. If a reliable independent source describes his career as "rich" we can quote that, but you can't use the Wikipedia Voice to promote a subject. Articles must be written from a neutral point of view.
 * Finally, and this is really important, you have a conflict of interest as you are obviously related to your Uncle. You do need to make a declaration by following the instructions at WP:COI - we require editors do this because we must ensure transparency when editors are in some way connected to the subject.
 * I hope that explains a bit better, but do let me know if you have any follow-up questions.  Qcne  (talk)  09:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)