User talk:NeoChaosX/Archive 3

Ittan
Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ittan (talk • contribs)

Was this removal approved?
See this edit. Jinxmchue 21:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To my knowledge, no. The thing is it's been rewritten, but it's sort of tough for me to tell if it still counts as a copyvio, since the basic structure of the original text is there, but a good amount of the words have been replaced. At the very least it could be AfD'd, but I'm not well known on conspiracy or FBI topics to know if this program was notable. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Jamify on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jamify. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ryanbomber 13:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I think some editors (including me, until just now) have developed a mistaken impression that you were involved in the speedy deletion. On second look, as far as I can tell you just closed the AfD when you realised the article had been deleted. It would help if you could clarify this at the DRV. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Do you know these guys???


San Jose Sharks vs. St. Louis Blues, November 28, 2006

I just saw that you spend much time with the article of the San Jose Sharks. Can you tell the names of the two players on the picture above? I would say it's Mark Smith (left) and Curtis Brown (right). Do you agree? --80.131.218.253 22:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * If I could clearly see the numbers, it'd be easier for me. Brown is definitely the player on the right; as for the player on the left, I'm not completely certain it could be Smith; he sort of reminds me of Mark Bell as well. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, but if you take a closer look at the fully enlarged picture you can see some blonde hair on the back of the head of the left player. This seems typical for Smith, haven't seen Bell with blonde hair yet. --80.131.218.253 23:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're right, that's definately not Bell; it probably is Smith - I'm not completely sure, but considering he's the only Shark who dyes his hair, I'd take your word for it. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Queenland Christian Soccer Association Page
Hi,

I setup the QCSA page a couple of weeks back with the intention of getting all our clubs to put some info about their clubs on to it similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane_Mens_Football.

I know that my next page Rivers Baptist Soccer Club was probably a bit of advertising but as I was finding information to not make it advertising it got deleted. How happy am I???

I am new to wikipedia and trying to help out our clubs get a little bit of a presence on the web and I was working out how to do it.

I was trying to make it comply but didn't get a chance.

Ah well it looks like it is gone now.

Thanks, Qcsachair 03:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

My Vandalism
Odd. Usually I get an orange-yellowish warning tag when people leave me a message. To be frank, I was hoping to get nailed by AntiVandalBot. My associates and I are conducting an experiment to see the bot has an "anon bias", but for the last three days not one single page we have hit has been reverted by AVB. This is becoming frustrating. 75.6.216.202 07:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the bots aren't the quickest way to do anything, but it fixes some of the more obvious vandalism. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

New Granada
Hi, I am working on some pages about the history of Colombia, and i noticed that you changed a redirect page i had done, and also deleted the contents.

The Viceroyalty of New Granada and The Republic of New Granada, are SEPARATED former countries, divided years apart.

The country that is now Colombia came to be after the transformation of the Colonies of Spain, in the following order,


 * The Royal Audiency of Santa Fe
 * The New Kingdom of Granada
 * The Viceroyalty of New Granada
 * The United Provinces of New Granada
 * The Great Colombia
 * The Republic of the New Granada
 * The Granadine Confederation
 * The United States of Colombia
 * The Republic of Colombia

im trying to create different pages that way i can expand them without having to look back to my sources, so please direct any concern to me before deleting or redirecting material to this pages. mijotoba 07:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, I wasn't aware of this. I saw the mostly blank article, and wasn't sure what to do with it, so I decided to redirect to the only other New Granada article there was. My apologies. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD
Sorry, missed that bit. Thanks for the heads up. --Fang Aili talk 01:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

bulldogs
Please check out my reply to your post plus another I've made on the same page. Keesiewonder talk 10:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Archives
Oh, my bad. – Someguy0830 (T | C)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JoeThornton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JoeThornton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Csu-seal.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Csu-seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

re: List of Swiss artists
Note that there's already Category:Swiss artists, so having such a list is redudant. Additionally, the creator,, originally created the article with a single entry, with a link to a site belonging to a "Vincent Spano". That's why I put marked the articles as spam. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, agreed it may be redundant, but that's not CSD. Anyway, give him time to work on the list, if he comes back tomorrow, and it still only has one person on it, then it's probably spam. Newbies can be pretty slow at creating new articles. Part Deux 08:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Guinea
If you look carefully you'll see i did a simple revert because someone had trashed the page. I'm not sure what was incorrect about that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.13.108.123 (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC).

oops
Thanks. I meant to do that but obviously something went amiss (closed the window without confirming or something). Buck  ets  ofg 02:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

excuse me?
"Ahem. Angelofdeath, please read Wikipedia:No original research. Fan websites and forums are not considered reliable sources, thus the entire criticism section is original research. I'm removing that section. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)"

..Who said that ENITRE section is solely from fansites? I sure most certainly did NOT. Candy Panda implyed it but I most definatly did not come my mouth. You should not even assumed that in the first place. &quot;THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!&quot; 19:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I am replying to your message about making changes in the Uruaguay article:

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Uruguay. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I corrected the population from 6 million to 3 million. For whatever reason the bottom of the page was deleted. Any attempt by me to correct the population figure causes the bottom of the page to be deleted. Maybe you should correct the population and see what happens.

Uberfic, and Articles for deletion/Uberfic (2nd nomination)
Please take a look at the sources I've supplied for the Uberfic article. I've never heard this term either, until now, but 15 minutes of researched turned up 3 independent nontrivial sources. I'd like to see if this changes your mind as the nominator &mdash;siro&chi;o 16:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help
Thanks for the help, I was just trying to follow the directions so I assumed it was correct (even though it did look weird). Again, thanks.

Chad Hennings 20:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Peyton Manning Article
Please do not add your own views, that is considered vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.43 (talk) 04:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
 * That was a mistake. I thought that infomation had been readded to article, not removed. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Douglas Murray
Oh, I might have screwed up. But I learned that he doesn't really like being called 'Doug'. He prefers being called (and is always using) 'Douglas Murray'. Might be that 'Douglas' is a (somewaht) normal swedish name, 'Doug' isn't.

I just wanted to let him be listed under his preferred name. Hdw 21:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * well fuck this, I'm not going to bother. Hdw 21:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry about causing any trouble I am new here and as you can see DO NOT KNOW how to handle this kind of "page creation". (dont know what to call it) I am sorry for the trouble.

Paper football
While I agree with your edits, I'm going to have to suggest that you don't revert on that page any more today, lest you get slapped with a 3-revert-rule block. Veinor (talk to me) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm aware of that. I'll stop for now, but I really wish I could get a few more editors to watch over this article to make sure it's not overriden with spam again. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The guy's on a final warning for spamming and I've got the page on my watchlist. Veinor (talk to me) 22:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

re:Xinet Fullpress
I'd appreciate it if you would put back the Xinet FullPress page, you deleted it before I had any time to respond, but I'm guessing from the general malaise that affects wikipedia of people that you couldn't give a monkeys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ex800 (talk • contribs)

re: San Jose Sharks
Hello,

You seem to be one of the top moderators of the Sharks section on Wikipedia. For starters I think the Sharks section is very well set up. I don't mind that you deleted the notable alumni section I added. The Sharks Wiki page use to have one several months ago, but was removed. Notable Alumni wouldn't be a bad addition to show more team history, but it's no big deal.

Also, I added Tom Preissing to the key youth players in 03-04 as he was team rookie of the year and has since become a fine 2-3 defenseman.

Here's to continued success. Always nice to find another fan of Team Teal.

SFW — Preceding unsigned comment added by SureFineWhatever (talk • contribs)

Image copyright problem with Image:JediKnight-cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:JediKnight-cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 05:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Angry Nerd
Your wish is granted :) IrishGuy talk 09:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 09:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

'Might Guy'? Not really.
No. The original Japanese name would NOT be 'Might Guy' any more than Lee's would be 'Rock Lee.' See, that's not how the Japanese speak OR spell. 'Ai' is the only way to make the long 'i' sound, so far as I've seen. Not 'igh' and not 'uy.' That's ridiculous. Also, we see them adding vowels onto the ends of names. In Death Note, Light becomes 'Raito' Lee, you may have noticed, is technically 'Rocku Ri.' Only 'Ri' sounds KIND OF like it's got a BIT of an 'l.' 'Might Guy' would be pronounced 'Mee-guh-hut Gooey.' Okay? So you're wrong, I'm afraid. 'Might Guy' is how they TRANSLATED IT FOR ENGLISH SPEAKERS. Something I don't agree with. It's a JAPANESE MANGA we can use some Japanese pronunciations! But...don't you think you're a bit late in the game? I've stopped. I had WALKED AWAY. You've won. I've gone off to spread my radical name-spellings elsewhere. Tread carefully on blog-sites, I could be spreading my sedition there, as well. Also, I am SO SORRY for speaking this way. And I am really, truly not being sarcastic when I say that. I'm sorry for it; I just don't take it back. But...couldn't we do something where in the opening bit we state that both names could maybe be accepted? That would make me really happy, and it wouldn't be TRULY wrong, would it? Lynna669 03:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Lynna669

Yep I do have a resource.
I got the information from one of my friends who is way further in the series than alot of people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kabutos hidden shadow (talk • contribs) 02:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC).

Nomination fix
Thanks for fixing my AFD nomination at Articles for deletion/Pars Society. The templates have obviously changed since I last started an AFD - somewhat ironic since I'm partly responsible for the choice of AFD categories offered, and especially since I was nominating on behalf of somebody else who didn't know the procedure! For future reference, do you have any idea what I mistyped? It looks like some of the subst: instructions didn't work, but it's been a while since I played about with templates so really can't work it out. Cheers, TheGrappler 18:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahh, so the problem was that the template is more clever than I am. Will bear this in mind in future! TheGrappler 18:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Noble House
I really appreciate your candidness. Thanks. DGG 08:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

nimrod1976/Mriraq Sockpuppet
I have been receiving emails after having gotten User:Mriraq blocked from what seems like one or two individuals. One claims to be Alaa Abdul Hadi, a former Miss Iraq, now User:nimrod1976, and one claims to be Ahmed Kadret, a former Mr. Iraq, User:Mriraq. Both persons claim to work for the Talat Organization. They have been polite and civil. I am attempting to steer Alaa to constructive contribution. I asked her to create an ID so she could upload the dozens of photos they sent me of past Miss Iraqs. I attempted to encourage her to communicate with me through this ID on wikipedia so I could instruct her on how to upload her photos. However, she went ahead and recreated Miss Iraq instead. Could you userfy both the original Miss Iraq and her recreation so that I can see what is going on. I will try to keep you posted on my progress and try to get her to communicate with me through wikipedia so that our communication will be transparent. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 22:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Miss Iraq
Hi,

I have posted the information thinking that if i provided reliable sources it wouldnt violate the terms of Wiki.

I have a question

how come when i posted that the claudia hanna article should be removed and deleted, no action was taken? since the article has one unreliable source and states false information regarding Miss Hanna's claim that she won Miss Iraq and took the title from Silva Sahagian when I provided links that Claudia IS NOT Miss Iraq 2006 and never took part in any official pageant no one seemed to bother.

I am simply trying to correct the article and it seems that people are biased towards an intentional false reporting.

Miss Iraq 2006 took place in Baghdad on April 5th 2006 and The Pageant Miss Hanna took part in was Miss Arab World 2006, where she won first runner up and then when Miss Arab World 2006 was dethroned, then Miss Arab World 2006 title was rewarded to Miss Hanna.

I thought Wiki is all about truth, but it seems false articles have a place here.

I dont mean to be rude, but every time I want someone to correct the content of Claudia Hanna, that seems to be deleted and such persistance on the false content that the article reports.

The Pageant in Sharam Al Sheikh was MISS ARAB WORLD 2006 and not Miss Iraq 2006.

Regards Alaa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nimrod1976 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC).

Miss Iraq
can you please send me the article i posted to

talatmodels@walla.com

and regarding the Claudia Hanna article, every time i send a correction statement backed up with reliable resources to the creators of that article, they seem to ignore it. They are persistent to the false information with regards to the Claudia Hanna article.

Regards,

Alaa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nimrod1976 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC).

Claudia Hanna
Hi,

1- Claudia Hanna's article states that Silva Sahagian resigned which is NOT TRUE and states that Claudia is Miss Iraq and won Miss Iraq in Sharam Al Sheikh which is false

if the resources state that she won Miss Iraq 2006 in Sharam Al Sheikh please send me those resources.

2- the article doesnt state her as Miss Arab World and says she is Miss Iraq only

thats why i will continue to find a way to get rid of this article because it has damaged the image of Silva Sahagian as Miss Iraq 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nimrod1976 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC).

Akamaru jump
i was wondering why you deleted the page about akamaru jump and made it a redirection —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greedisland14 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

Miss Iraq
I have had a chance to look further into the controversy. I believe the problem is that wikipedia is recognizing Two people as Miss Iraq 2006 without clarifying the distinction. From what I can tell Silva Shahakian is the official Miss Iraq. I have fixed the citations on her page. You mentioned reliable sources regarding Claudia Hanna. If you get a chance, send me some. I only find blogs in a google search. I will properly cite her page and clarify her title. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 15:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

England One Day International Records
Wait more than two minutes after an article is created before slating it for deletion, ok mate?

That page was a red title on the England Cricket Team page.

I was doing a complicated table for it and your action just wasted my time and made it harder.

Why don't you try writing an article for ten minutes and give me a chance to put some work into this one?

Nick mallory 08:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for withdrawing the speedy. Nick mallory 09:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Claudia Hanna
could you send me one reliable source that says that she won Miss Iraq in Sharam El Sheikh?

are you the writer of this article?Nimrod1976 14:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Claudia Hanna
sweetie, waleg and pannet arent official nor reliable sources these are blogs, also on waleg there is a Miss Palestine 2007 they claim that it took place in Haifa and we all know that Haifa is an Israeli city and Miss Israel takes place there.

I rest my case

Alaa91.144.44.2 07:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Miss Iraq
{{subst:DRVNote|MISSIRAQNimrod1976 15:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I dont what im doing but i believe you deleted Miss Iraq page which i recreated, so can I have it back please i was in the process of adding the links and references etc.

Thank YouNimrod1976 15:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Saikyou Ninja Daikeshuu 4
Dude, check leafninja.com or saiyanisland.com. I'm pretty sure that Kyuubi is spelled with two u's. By the way, were you the one who deleted my change to The Sound Four and Kimmmaro? I have the game fully completed, and you can play as thier Cursed Seal Level 2 versions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aspffpsa (talk • contribs) 06:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC).

SBGT
Why do you want to delete SBGT?! User:Manplush

SBGT
It is a real series, i'm just still editing it, if you wnat proof i going to upload a picture of the anime in a while (FYI: just beuase there is no picture doen't mean it does not exist. don't judge a book by it's cover.

Fine you can delete it, but it is a real anime series...ok whatever, it's your loss.

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 02:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

WarGames
I really wanted to make a new article for this game, I really enjoyed this game when it was first out. but I was trying to figure out how to make a good looking page, without just stealing information. Yet I couldnt figure out how to do the Video Game layout with all that good information (Like the table) I was hoping if I even just created a stub, someone else would be able to contribute the rest of the information. It took me quite a while to make what I had. This was one of my first real contributions, I have added small bits of information to articles, but I have never attempted a full article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xyberdawg (talk • contribs) 21:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

admin
Hey. I've seen some of your work and was wondering if you'd be willing to try runnign for adminship over at WP:RFA. I'd be glad to nominate you if you're willing. Let me know of your decision.-- Wizardman 03:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Knight Whitefire
Hi NeoChaosX. I looked at some of this user's edits and they didn't appear to be vandalism. I don't think removing comments like these is vandalism - I'd probably have done so myself. I know it may have looked like vandalism, due to his/her lack of edit summary usage, but I wouldn't classify it as such. What do you reckon? Cheers, – Riana ⁂  07:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That's OK :) I thought so too, especially because he kept the section links in, but then I saw a few legitimate edits, and checked again. No harm done - I've dropped him a line about edit summaries. Take care, – Riana ⁂  07:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Re. Picnic Monsters
I am unclear why you would consider Picnic Monsters nonsense. Perhaps you've never encountered Picnic Monsters, but Picnic Monsters carried off my Father at a very young age while he was fighting in Grenada. It has made a profound impact on me and I was simply hoping to use Wikipedia as a forum to warn people about Picnic Monsters. Their victim's blood will be on your hands. God Bless. JJAshfiel 07:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Pineapple Dishwasher
I just don't understand. My Grandfather, an irrefutable source of knowledge, has owned and operated a Pineapple Dishwasher during a brief but productive stay in Germany. I apologize if this machine offended you personally but I scarcely believe that this machine can be deemed inappropriate. If the article seems sparse it is because I have not obtained the necessary specs and testimonials.

Thank you
Thank you for moving this report to the right place. It's much more easier on de:WP (single page for any vandalism). ;) Have a nice day,--84.175.240.36 08:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Name links in 2007 Stanley Cup Playoffs
I think you might have gone one step too far with unlinking player names. I completely understand the guidelines in Manual of Style (links) with respect to linking the first instance on a page, but I don't think they necessarily apply here. Sports results pages are unlike pages that consist primarlily of prose text, in that readers don't typically read from top to bottom. For example, if I am navigating this kind of page and jump first to the results and description of the final series (as it is most important), I probably won't see many wikilinked player names unless I scroll backwards, and then it is a bit of a search exercise. I would prefer to see wikilinks removed for second and subsequent instances only in the same section (i.e. series). What do you think? Andrwsc 20:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hm. The format i was using was the way it was done in 2006 Stanley Cup Playoffs, but I see your concern in why they should be linked in further sections. I'lhelp take care of that. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 20:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the quick response! Andrwsc 20:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

San Jose FAR
San Jose has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Loodog 03:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

So you're the one who spearheaded this prejudice all along!
Do you want WP to become the new 17th century Japan? I don't! I believe you're the ringleader in these witchhunts targeting pages on foreign languages! These pages are necessary on the Wikipedia, and you're becoming a real-life Hans Gruber, trying to kill our knowledge of foreign languages! Believe me, I speak Spanish! I don't want to have to report you for trying to scare Spanish-speaking English Wikipedia users off the Wikipedia! --Ryanasaurus0077 12:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Frank Carney
Just out of curiosity, which of the following:"WikiLawyering (and the related term pettifogging) is a pejorative term that refers to certain ineffective quasi-legal practices, including:

1. Using formal legal terms in an inappropriate way when discussing Wikipedia policy; 2. Abiding by the letter of a policy or guideline while violating its spirit; 3. Asserting that the technical interpretation of Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines should override the principles they express; and 4. Misinterpreting policy or relying on technicalities to justify inappropriate actions." do you think i committed?Tstrobaugh 15:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

About what I said about you
...I'm sorry. My twin brother really showed me just how the hell stupid I was to compare you to Tokugawa Iemitsu and Hans Gruber. All I wanted was to stop systemic bias from turning the English-language Wikipedia into the All-American Wikipedia. But somehow... with Black Harry around wiretapping into my comments... I snuck some more beer out of the refrigerator. I wasn't trying to climb the Reichstag dressed as Spidey or anything, I just wanted to help preserve the morality of the WP. --Ryanasaurus0077 23:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding The Way
NeoChaosX, your aptness in attacking The Way sickens me. Who cares if it was made using RPG Maker. Have you even bothered playing any of The Way games? The Way is greater than tons of so-called 'Non-Amateur' games. Hell, the storyline is one of the greatest ever conceived and it took a single guy, not a whole team of 'Professionals'. Fact not opinion. It hasn't got any 'Reliable' sources becuase corporate sell-out wannabes like you don't give things like The Way the time of day. You and others like you are just out to crap all over the little guy. It doesn't matter becuase one way or another a reliable source WILL be found and The Way will be Wikipedia worthy and when it does you're going to look like the massive dumbass you really are. I'll apologise in advance for any apparent rudeness I may have displayed but it's hard to remain polite when everything turns the water in my kettle to fumes. It just escapes me how one person can fail to see the greatness of The Way. Instead of criticising it, you could do the mature thing and try to help it. If you still fail to find anything, then and only then will you have any credibility whatsoever. If this is deleted it will only serve to proove my point furthur...80.44.141.44 21:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Is it is just the fact there were no reliable sources that it was deleted then?ABlackGentleman 11:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

"Nom" AfD
Hi! Just curious, why was Nom put up for a AfD instead of a Speedy Delete? It seems like patent nonsense to me. I'm new here and would like to learn the ropes of when a speedy delete is and isn't appropriate. Thank you! DangerousNerd talk  21:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DangerousNerd  talk  21:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/The Bhoys from Seville
Thank you for your contribution on the above AfD. Your time and effort is much appriciated. regards--Vintagekits 01:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Akira-helmet.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Akira-helmet.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:AkiraKazama.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AkiraKazama.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion welcome at deletion review for Plot of Les Mis
After Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables closed as a deletion, I'm challenging the way the closing administrator acted as in violation of Wikipedia rules. Your participation is welcome at that discussion, Deletion review/Log/2007 July 14. Please keep in mind that only arguments related to either new information or to how Wikipedia rules were violated or not violated in closing the discussion will be considered. It isn't a replay of the original AfD. I'm familiar with WP:CANVASSING and I am alerting everyone who participated in that discussion to the deletion review. I won't contact anyone again on this topic, and I apologize if you consider this note distracting. Noroton 04:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm on Editor Review
I'm on Editor Review!. Sam ov the blue sand 03:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

The AnimeLand and sockpuppet suspicions
Greetings! Have you got some diffs or contribution histories to point me at with your sockpuppet suspicions? If I can see the evidence, I'll speedy delete and block the creator. —C.Fred (talk) 01:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Somebody else got to him with the block, actually. I've speedy deleted the article; the sockpuppeteer was blocked, not banned, so while it's not CSD G5, it's still eligible for speedy deletion as vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 01:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Yep, User:Jiky was the missing link there. Another administrator blocked him by the time I looped back (and saw your intervention request); once he was blocked, then I speedy-deleted the page as continued vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 01:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)