User talk:Neoballmon III

Guten Tag!
Hi. I hate the red link, so I'm just going to start to type some random crap that as usual when I do this, noone reads because it goes on for ages and ages and generally has no relevance to anything at all, but I just enjoy it because it's the possibility to do it. I could offer money and I highly doubt anyone would read it far enough to be able to claim the money. And while I'm talking about offering money, I might do so..I will give you $3 if you read this, and all you have to do is send me a $5 cheque (I need the extra $2 to be able to send the money to you without going into a loss at all as well as to cover the processing fee for the cheque. Anyway, as for getting rid of the red link, I think it's gone by now, it was probably gone before I even finished typing Hi but I might as well just type some more crap to make sure it'll never be back! Surprisingly though, I'm starting to get bored of this already, which I think must be the earliest I've ever gotten bored of doing this, so I guess I'll bid you good day and giidnguth to you all!! -- Neoballmon III 09:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rick.istall
A tag has been placed on Rick.istall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You didn't even give me a change to 'hangon'!!! You deleted it! How could you do that to me????? Neoballmon III (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE VISIT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.92.1.32 (talk) 01:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Omg a duck
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Omg a duck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 02:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. This is your only warning, as you vandalised a page, and even asked not to revert it.  Lourie Pieterse  15:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe I said not to revert for 20 minutes, and I DID revert it back 21 minutes later. I apologise for the inconvenience. Neoballmon III (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello Neoballmon III. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Coles Supermarkets‎, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Bidgee, sorry to be annoying. I understand that I do work for the company, and it could appear impartial, but I think that I am only stating what I have seen change in store, and just what a customer would see if they were to write the article as well. The store I currently work at isn't even going through a major renewal, I have witnessed the majority of the changes at my local store. I don't think I am putting any emphasis on positivity in this article, but I'm sorry if I am. And it's not like I'm slandering Woolies or Foodland/IGA. Neoballmon III (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)