User talk:Neocorelight/archive

September 2018
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, It (2017 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fallout (series) ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Reliable secondary sources classify New Vegas as a spin off, so please stop repeatedly doing this. -- ferret (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * How do I join WikiProject Videogames, ? --Enjoyer of World (talk) 22:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Test. --Enjoyer of World (💬) 01:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Signature examples
Hello. At Signature tutorial, we have been limiting users to one example each. One could make a case for situations like yours, involving two very different examples, but that opens the door to abuses. Editors usually go through a number of signatures before they settle on one, and a few of them have sought to document that entire progression in the examples list. Would you mind reducing to one? By the way, your second one is very nice in my opinion. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  20:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I'll remove one. Enjoyer of World (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  23:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , how can I globally set my signature so it'll be the same across all wikis? Enjoyer of World (💬) 02:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no idea. Suggest WP:HD. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  02:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ajpolino • LuK3
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jackmcbarn
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

Technical news
 * The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (T261630).

Arbitration
 * The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
 * Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.

Miscellaneous
 * The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
 * Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , testing the script. Enjoyer of World💬 06:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Songs that are over 6 minutes has been nominated for discussion
Category:Songs that are over 6 minutes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

rollback
Hi Enjoyer of World. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AEnjoyer_of_World enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 05:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Understood and thank you, . Happy editing! Enjoyer of World💬 06:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

WRE
I see you undid my page move, but as I have said, the "western" is just an adjective describing one half of one empire. It is not a name, and neither is "eastern Roman empire". There was only ever one empire. GPinkerton (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , really? I'm not an expert on that subject but I see that both Western and Eastern Roman Empire are treated as names nearly everywhere in Wikipedia. I think this should go through a Requested Move process. Enjoyer of World💬 02:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Upon further reading the article, I think your decision to move that article is really wrong. Enjoyer of World💬 03:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Why? I think the usage on Wikipedia is an artefact of the page titles having to be capitalized. GPinkerton (talk) 03:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * So it's just about your opinion after all. Enjoyer of World</b>💬 03:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No, no, it's a fact that it was one empire and scholarship deals with it as two halves of a single entity. Opinion doesn't come into it really. GPinkerton (talk) 04:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You're correct. It's two different political entities of the same empire. As such modern scholars gave them separate names to distinguish them. That's why their names are capitalized. <b style="font-family:monospace;font-variant:small-caps;border:0.5px solid #6d6f30;background:linear-gradient(#cdf4ae,#cbedf8);color:#6d6f30">Enjoyer of World</b>💬 04:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not in the scholarship I've read. GPinkerton (talk) 04:54, 9 November 2020 (U-->

"List of youngest birth mothers" edit
Hi, my post to the talk page was blocked by the edit filter. I don't know what triggered it but the gist of my argument is WP:CITOGENESIS. The reference for "Samantha Goodman" is clearly copied from an earlier version of List of youngest birth mothers. 144.96.41.37 (talk) 11:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Let me check that. <b style="font-family:monospace;font-variant:small-caps;border:0.5px solid #6d6f30;background:linear-gradient(#cdf4ae,#cbedf8);color:#6d6f30">Enjoyer of World</b>💬 11:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for informing this to me. You could've used your message that you posted here as an edit summary. That'll save you from explaining it in the article's talk page. <b style="font-family:monospace;font-variant:small-caps;border:0.5px solid #6d6f30;background:linear-gradient(#cdf4ae,#cbedf8);color:#6d6f30">Enjoyer of World</b>💬 11:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. I just got carried away with detail and even a backstory. 144.96.41.37 (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Composer(s)
No, I never said he "compose[d] the entire series", instead of removing the parameter, why not expand or specify instead? TherasTaneel (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , no, I don't think we need to add that parameter for a series article. <b style="font-family:monospace;font-variant:small-caps;border:0.5px solid #6d6f30;background:linear-gradient(#cdf4ae,#cbedf8);color:#6d6f30">Enjoyer of World</b>💬 03:00, 15 November 2020