User talk:Neojerzey

Welcome
ukexpat (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Michael P. Hoffecker
A tag has been placed on Michael P. Hoffecker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Marcusmax (talk) 00:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Michael P. Hoffecker
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Michael P. Hoffecker, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. And please do not delete the db template again. Marcusmax (talk) 20:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Your e-mail message
Thanks for the message, I prefer to keep communications on-Wiki. As you will see from the above notices, the article has been deleted so I don't understand where you are seeing the details that you mentioned. Please respond on my talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 20:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Search engine results
We have no controls over search engines and the data which they have stored in the past; thus, we have no control over what comes up in Google or Yahoo or whoever. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Hoffecker


The article Michael Hoffecker has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bk314159 (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Autobiography is strongly discouraged
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a collaborative project to build an encyclopedia, not a place for people to post their profiles or job descriptions - for that, you want a site like LinkedIn or Facebook. Article subjects have to be notable, a Wikipedia term which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases. More details in WP:Notability (people). From the description you give, it does not seem to me that you are notable: that is in no way discreditable - I am not notable, nor are most of the people in the world. We are simply not of enough general interest to warrant an article in an encyclopedia.


 * Even if you were notable, for reasons explained above and in the article WP:Autobiography, you would be very strongly discouraged from writing an article about yourself, because you would have a conflict of interest.


 * As a Wikipedia contributor you have a user page at User:Neojerzey which can be used to give some information about yourself, but even there, to quote from User pages: "you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal website. Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project."


 * I am sorry to be so discouraging, but Wikipedia is not for what you want to use it for. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Johann Philipp Hoffecker
A tag has been placed on Johann Philipp Hoffecker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 10:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for genealogies either. &mdash; RHaworth 10:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of James P. Hoffecker


A tag has been placed on James P. Hoffecker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 00:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)