User talk:Neoplop

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Damiens .rf 20:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens .rf 13:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 16:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MiriamWolfeWitch.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Dspradau   → talk   04:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

''Read the discussion. The source is not verifiable. Feel free to ask your questions there.''

April 2019
Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of unaccredited institutions of higher education without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)