User talk:Nephron

Barnstar
Particularly for the GI ones! Hope all is well -- Samir 04:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Flagged revisions
I note that you added a link to the German WP on Flagged revisions. I was hoping someone would do that. I cannot read German so I could not do it. Are able to read German? If so can you do some digging for info on flagged revisions and add it to WikiProject Flagged Revisions? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:RadiologyWikiProject
A tag has been placed on Template:RadiologyWikiProject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:PathologyWikiProject
A tag has been placed on Template:PathologyWikiProject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:OphthoWikiProject
A tag has been placed on Template:OphthoWikiProject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:NephroWikiProject
A tag has been placed on Template:NephroWikiProject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GIWikiProject
A tag has been placed on Template:GIWikiProject requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Melanosis coli
Great pictures dude and the rewrite is smoother. I was looking to hit up Crohn's disease for FA when I had more time a little later -- any micrographs you could rustle up? -- Samir 03:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Have an endo image of PMC -- will pull up -- Samir 03:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Help with dermatology-related content
I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our new Bolognia push 2009!, history of dermatology, or list of dermatologists pages? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 17:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Colitis
Great micrographs -- fantastic. May take me a bit but I will add to colitis. Also have to work on Crohn's disease. Take care -- Samir 04:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Nephron. Can you explain the "waste-basket" sub-heading that you added last month  in Colitis (in layman's terms) - it's got me baffled! Thanks -- Timberframe (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response and re-working of the article. As a layman, that;s a lot clearer to me now. -- Timberframe (talk)'

Request
Could you please contact me at kemmek@aol.com? Ekem (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of ANCA (company)
I have nominated ANCA (company), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/ANCA (company)&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 19:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Serous cystadenoma
Hi, now that Serous cystadenoma is a disambiguation page, could you help clean up the links that now point to the disambig per WP:FIXDABLINKS? There are tools you can use to make fixing dablinks easier; I use a combination of WP:AWB and navigation popups (with the popupFixDabs flag set to true). Cheers, -- Ja Ga  talk 10:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Chorangioma
An article is not allowed to have redlinked categories on it — the fact that shows up as a red link means that the category does not exist. If you want the uncat tag to come off chorangioma, you need to find and add categories that actually exist. Bearcat (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Believe me, if I thought you were doing it in bad faith you'd have gotten far more than a polite request to look for categories that actually exist — people add a lot of categories to articles in good faith which don't, and sometimes genuinely shouldn't, exist, but that doesn't mean we're obligated to leave them there just because they were good faith edits.
 * Anyway, as for why I didn't create the category myself: firstly, based on how we organize categories I don't think it would be the most appropriate category for the article anyway — we categorize things by what they are, not by related keywords, so the categories that are added to the article generally need to be able to complete the sentence "TITLE is a CATEGORY". Chorangioma is a placenta? Not really, no — according to your article, it's a disease or disorder of some kind, and should be placed in the same categories as other directly related diseases or disorders. And secondly, given that I'm mostly unfamiliar with medical terminology, even if I did create I'd have no idea where to file it in the category system. Bearcat (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The thing is, you didn't create a category. You stuck the word "Placenta" in a category tag, but the actual category did not, and still doesn't, exist — as demonstrated by the fact that it was and still is a red link. No matter how many category tags an article has on it, the article is uncategorized if those categories don't actually exist. Simply sticking a word in a category tag does not automagically "create" a category; if you want the category to stay on the article instead of having it relabelled as "uncategorized" again, then you still have to follow the actual process of actually creating the actual category. Bearcat (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Pancreatic acinar metaplasia
Please improve the text of this article: I don't know what you mean by "Pancreatic acinar metaplasia is benign finding ...". PamD (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Pathology
Dear Nephron, thank you for uploading so many high quality pathologic specimen images at Commons. I integrated now many of them in the german wikibook Pathologie. --Bcr-abl (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Femoral artery and branches.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Femoral artery and branches.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stroma and Clear cell carcinoma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Pathology task force
Great to see you getting it up and running. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * BTW you wouldn't happen to have an image for Diffuse panbronchiolitis would you? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 12:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Cholesterol embolism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biconvex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hemodialysis product


The article Hemodialysis product has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Proposed per WP:DICDEF. Has not been edited in nearly five years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Cryptosporidiosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. When you recently edited Central neurocytoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pseudorosette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Dale Dubin
Dear Nephron, I have reopened the 2009 discussion at User talk:Draeco/Dubin. I would greatly appreciate your re-evaluation of the article. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited Ohngren's line, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Line, Inferior and Plane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. When you recently edited Placental infarction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Die (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. When you recently edited Products of conception, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Author/Nephron

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address edited an article on Genital warts. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance.Hydra Rain (talk) 16:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stroma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transplant glomerulopathy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transplantation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiMedicine
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 19:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

File:Greater and lesser sac 1035.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greater and lesser sac 1035.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hi Nephron,

my name is Mike. I'm currently trying to get the LFB-H&E stain to work but failed so far. Do you have a protocol you can provide me with please email me mikeschmidt8@hotmail.com

thanks best regards mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike010681 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Featured media nomination of Normal gastric mucosa intermed mag.jpg
Discovered this beautiful image you uploaded whilst editing. Definitely deserves FM status. Nomination is here: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Stomach mucosa, editors are invited to comment. --LT910001 (talk) 03:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy quarterly newsletter
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

A historical perspective on moment in physics and mathematics
I have posted a comment in your article/discussion on 'moment'. Please consider my request to elaborate the historical perspective on the issue. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Wikipedia defense for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia defense is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wikipedia defense & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Vandenberg (chat) 16:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Gastrointestinal surgery
Template:Gastrointestinal surgery has been nominated for merging with Template:Digestive system procedures. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Nephron,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Normal gastric mucosa intermed mag.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 20, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-11-20. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy newsletter #5
Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carpopedal spasm


The article Carpopedal spasm has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * essentially a definition, with no MEDRS source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Step-by-step description of hemodialysis
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Step-by-step description of hemodialysis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-definition/Dialysis/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Step-by-step description of hemodialysis and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Step-by-step description of hemodialysis, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Step-by-step description of hemodialysis. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Step-by-step description of hemodialysis with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Step-by-step description of hemodialysis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Snori (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Minetest - why not an article?
Greetings, Nephron. The topic of Minetest itself is certainly and indisputably notable. However, the article wasn't declined due to the lack of notability established but the lack of reliable sources. If the AfC submission had half the sources on the German counterpart, that'll be great. The sources ever cited are just its homepage and other wikis; all which are primary sources per Verifiability. EROS message 03:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm


A tag has been placed on Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://apps.pathology.jhu.edu/blogs/pancreas/?p=39. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –dlthewave ☎ 16:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Step-by-step description of hemodialysis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Step-by-step description of hemodialysis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Step-by-step description of hemodialysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Urologic disease
Template:Urologic disease has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

"Micropapillary" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Micropapillary. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Doctors for Medicare for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Doctors for Medicare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canadian Doctors for Medicare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam at Megaputer (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Radial a and ulnar a.gif


The file File:Radial a and ulnar a.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Redundant to File:Gray527.png which is hosted on Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 02:54, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:DSM personality disorders
Template:DSM personality disorders has been nominated for merging with Template:Personality disorder classification. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Xurizuri (talk) 07:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Alzheimer type II astrocytes microphotograph in Hepatic encephalopathy page
Please, note that the pictures of "Alzheimer type II astrocytes" in Hepatic encephalopathy page are NOT Alzheimer type II astrocytes, these are neurons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signamax (talk • contribs) 10:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

MACE / Cecostomy article
Hi, I see you're the original creator of the Malone Antegrade Continence Enema article; I was thinking about expanding/altering it — as I'll detail on its Talk page — but wanted to check with you on potential changes to be sure they wouldn't just end up being reverted. (Side note: you might want to archive your Talk page again, it's so long that even the non-preview sourcecode editor has slowed to a crawl.) Hope your year is going well so far! MiaowMinx (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:PCM" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:PCM and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)