User talk:Nepomuk 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Sven Stolpe
A tag has been placed on Sven Stolpe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Solar fuel cycle
John Daglish (talk) - Thanks for your addition to the Carbon dioxide removal article. Since the text you added covered a way to use CO2, rather than remove it, I moved your text to the section Uses in the article on Carbon dioxide. Nepomuk 3 (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It seems this is the way to contact you. You have just edited an article on Carbon dioxide removal putting the item ==Solar fuel cycle== in the Carbon dioxide. How can one start a new page on "Carbon capture and transformation - methane fuel cycle" as there does not seem to be a page on this subject. Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage is related but not exactly. John Daglish  (talk) (discussion moved here with copy on Nepomuk 3 (talk).


 * Since you want to describe "methane fuel cycle", perhaps this page could be a better place to describe "Carbon capture and transformation - methane fuel cycle": Methane Nepomuk 3 (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

carbon negative fuel
Are you aware that carbon extraction from seawater costs between half and 1/10th as much as carbon air extraction?
 * That's .. verrry interesting. I know that the US Navy's Naval Research Lab has also investigated extracting CO2 from seawater.  Their intent is to use it to synthesize jet fuel from hydrogen and CO2 at sea, using military nuclear power.  But the volume of water that has to be processed is pretty huge.  If the moisture swing method that Klaus Lackner & company are playing with pans out, air extraction might still prove cheaper. Agnostic Engineer (talk) 09:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

When carbon neutral fuel is produced from such extraction and burned in power plants which also capture carbon at the flue, that is strictly carbon negative. (Review.) &mdash; Cup co  22:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

http://www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/governance/scientific-committee/sc-opinions/opinions-on-scientific-issues/sc-opinion-on-greenhouse-gas may also be of interest to you on biofuels and biomass. &mdash; Cup co  23:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glenn Winslade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vienna Conservatory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Biorecro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biorecro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Biorecro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 18:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Biorecrologo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Biorecrologo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086 Talk 04:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)