User talk:Nepsis2

Probable favoritism to the Russian Orthodox Church?
Since I just founding out, that my old edit from months ago, was undo for no reason, but however, its being relevant with an hot serious issue within the Eastern Orthodox Church right now–even its even more slow with the Pandemic, spite only three [Greek] Eastern Orthodox Churches has accepted the [national] Ukrainian Orthodox Church or Orthodox Church of Ukraine as 'Canonical'. And instantly it was your doing. Along I just founding your section decree that the OCU can't be a canonical Autocephalous Orthodox church right now.

Plus, while I somewhat agreeing that a course most Orthodox [autocephalous] churches aren't favoring the OCU's canonization right now, due of most all the of national Patriarchs in the Eastern Orthodox world, has some alliance with the current Russian Patriarchate. But the problem of how their religion's works, is that the Ecumenical Patriarchate is the denomination's 'First among equals' in English or formally the de jure Eastern Orthodox Churches' supreme head, so in their religious and theological theory, that Orthodox Church from Ukraine is by in religious law (Tomos) default canonized and can accept waiting for more Autocephalous churches to accept it later, without the Russian Patriarchate's approval. And I may worried this may count, that your removal and the other unaware thinking about the aftermath of the schism. Is sounding probably siding for the Russian Orthodox Church, for no unintentional reason? Chad The Goatman (talk) 06:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, Chad. This is not favoritism, your categorization was (and still is) factually incorrect.  The Russian Orthodox Church is by no means alone among autocephalous Orthodox Churches in declining to treat the OCU as if it were Orthodox.  Relating this fact is not favoritism towards the Russian Orthodox Church by any means.  Nepsis2 (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's I write two day ago, with the very first sentence for the second paragraph, I'm was almost agreeing with you that for now (or a least until when, the other Autocephalous Orthodox Churches, could abandoned the Russian Patriarchate's secular-disguised "religious" politics, to followed that First among equals, Ecumenical Patriarch's has spiritually decree) that most all the national Orthodox Churches will not canonized the OCU, due of this current schism, that the ROC did this for the third time in the Church's history, which these two has been mutual feud since the Cold War ended, over who's declaring their spiritual canonical territory for their most usually (semi-canonized) Autonomous Orthodox Churches, which the Ecumenical Patriarchate did experience the latter previous schism for a short-time. Chad The Goatman (talk) 12:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Your description of the role of the Patriarchate of Constantinople represents one viewpoint in a dispute within the Orthodox Church. Wikipedia entries are supposed to be written with a neutral point of view.  It is not appropriate to treat one side of a controversy as if it were an accomplished fact, when the issue is not settled.  Nepsis2 (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * While I undeniably and would've can agree with you for the moment as of May 2020, but it doesn't change anything as based on their faith, as the Ecumenical Patriarchate is still by their religious law, the supreme head of their religion, and it will take a while until more Churches could bravely enough to recognized and canonized this disputed church, without getting another immature schismatic sissy fit, like the ROC is doing for the third time in their religion's history. Chad The Goatman (talk) 19:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You keep claiming "the Ecumenical Patriarchate is still by their religious law, the supreme head of their religion." This is simply not a NPOV statement.  I think you have imbibed a single viewpoint as fact.  I would encourage you to read other viewpoints in order to expand your knowledge of the situation before editing more Wikipedia articles relating to this topic.  Nepsis2 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe because the Eastern Orthodox Church page itself, its organization's page, or any Eastern Orthodox pages will may or less likely not including them, as the "first" Orthodox Catholic Church, due being very historically signifiance in European history–prior to the Russian Empire existence or its eventually Russian Orthodox Church after 1453, especially they were the (Eastern Roman Empire) Byzantine Empire's state religion for its major entire political lifetime to the religion's early history. Chad The Goatman (talk) 23:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

CS1 error on Goodyear Blimp
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Goodyear Blimp, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Nepsis2&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1234419049 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goodyear_Blimp&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1234419049%7CGoodyear%20Blimp%5D%5D Ask for help])