User talk:Nepzuesli88

October 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328 (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

The new name would be fine. But what is your connection to the company? Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Daniel - I work for CloudBlue. We are trying to get our very basic details of our company on Wikipedia as we are a subsidiary of Ingram Micro (already on Wikipedia). We summarized our history and attempted to write in a non-promotional manner. Are any adjustments needed or do I need to declare this on my user page? Cloudbluewiki (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, if you're employed by Cloud Blue, you're considered a paid editor even if you're not doing this as part of your job duties. I would commend you to our conflict-of-interest policies (short and long) to review and see if you can edit and comply with them. You might also want to look at our policies on when we can have articles on individual companies, and see if Cloud Blue qualifies. Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Daniel - Thanks I've read over all the pages you sent. In regards to the paid editor, I can disclose that on my user page and on the affected article, however currently I am blocked and can not edit either. Additionally it looks like someone deleted my article draft for the same reasons. Regarding the second point of the company being notable, I would think CloudBlue would be as it meets the conditions of the page you shared, additionally CloudBlue is mention in this wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingram_Micro - Would it be ok to be unblocked and have a username change? Then I can add the disclosures and talk to the user who deleted the draft about re-submitting for their review. Cloudbluewiki (talk) 20:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * My concern is more about the nature of what you were writing. You led with CloudBlue is an American SaaS company specializing in automating connections between each step of the supply chain. The company provides a complete managed marketplace platform for the everything-as-a-service world. CloudBlue is based in Irvine, California, U.S. and powers more than 200 of the world's largest service provider cloud marketplaces, which collectively represent more than 27 million enterprise cloud subscriptions and over $1B in annual subscription revenue, as well as a history that reads like "why we are so good", and specific lines like which offers out-of-the-box functionality to build and scale your subscription business. (my stress). This wasn't a marginal case, it was egregiously advertorial and makes me concerned that your attempts to write in a non-promotional manner are so far from meeting our neutrality requirements that unblocking you would be to see the same issues in the future. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I have carried out the rename requested. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Nosebagbear, I completely agree, a poor attempt at a first submission without understanding of the rules. I'd like to create another submission that has no advertorial text, only basic factual information as well I don't think the submission has to be as large as it was as it is only a subsidiarily. Would this be possible? Nepzuesli88 (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I would like to interject and say that Wikipedia is not for "basic factual information". Wikipedia is not a directory of businesses, it is an encyclopedia of topics deemed notable by the Wikipedia community. Mere existence does not warrant inclusion; there are criteria to meet. For businesses, that is written at WP:ORG. Any article about your company would need to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the business, showing how it meets that definition of a notable business.  "Significant coverage" goes beyond basic coverage, press releases, interviews, etc., and goes into detail about what is influential, significant, or important about the business as the source sees it, not as the business sees it. I don't speak for others, but in this situation I would want to see edits in other areas that demonstrate your understanding of these concepts and policies before permitting you to further edit about your company. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot, I agree with all that you have outlined. Thank you. Nepzuesli88 (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * So do you agree to refrain from editing about your company, at least for now? What other topics would you edit instead? 331dot (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot, Yes that seems fair thank you. Nepzuesli88 (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * What topics will you edit about instead? 331dot (talk) 16:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)