User talk:Nerd1a4i/Archive 1

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nerd1a4i. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 13:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Helm (author) (December 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Helm (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  03:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilka Agricola (January 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ilka Agricola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  04:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Norwegian television series
In List of Norwegian television series, I would recommend keeping the shows listed under their original Norwegian titles, because few of them are known internationally under translated titles. If the shows do have established titles translated into English, those titles can be listed in the "Notes" column. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Stub tags
Hallo Heather, Please note that stub goes at the end, not the top, of an article, per WP:ORDER. And if you'd looked at the end of Barrow v The Master you'd have seen that it already has a specific stub tag, so does not need the general one to be added. Thanks. Pam D  08:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * And stub doesn't take any parameters, so your "issues" was misplaced. Pam  D  08:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hallo again - same editor new name, a small surprise. Another issue about stub tags: please take care not to add stub to an article like Giorgino which already has a specific stub tag. It puts it back into the category of stubs awaiting stub-sorting, and wastes other editors' time. Thanks. Pam  D  08:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

IPvandal 99.69.111.152 was reported to WP:AIV
Just thought I'd let you know that I reported him/her for multiple vandalism and ignoring of warnings. Thanks for taking care of his vandalism on Brownie for me. L3X1 (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hasty CSD tagging
Hello Nerd1a4i. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at 2016–17 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.

The article referred to above is 2016–17 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season, which you tagged 2 minutes post its creation. The author added the page content later. 103.6.159.69 (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

A note about CSD A7
While patrolling new pages, I came across Undivided Friends, an article you tagged for speedy deletion as CSD A7. I just wanted to let you know that I removed your tag and replaced it with a proposed deletion tag. According to the criteria for speedy deletion, [t]his criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. Because this particular topic is about an upcoming short film, I do not feel CSD A7 would be applicable. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Have a great day! MJ94 (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Another note about CSD A7
I came across Alberto Pizzarello which you tagged for A7 speedy deletion; I have removed your tag. Significance is clearly asserted in the short article, so A7 does not apply. A very quick Google search reveals that Pizzarello is indeed a fairly well-known poet as indicated by the article. It is also inappropriate to request deletion of brand new articles only two minutes after they are created, we call this biting the newcomers and it's undesirable as it drives new editors away from the project. I see this is going to be the third warning you've received today regarding speedy deletion tagging; if you are not sure of what you're doing please slow down and consider asking questions at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol. Thanks. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 04:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden Figures (book) has been accepted
 Hidden Figures (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Timothy Joseph Wood 13:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks for repairing my Article!
Hey, thanks for helping and repairing my article Clash-A-Rama, and fixing those tables. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Clash-a-Rama The article has progressed a lot (All thanks to you for creating the table). Please take a look and tell me if there is anything else to fix.HighnessAtharva (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANerd1a4i granted] the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. -- Samtar talk &middot; contribs 18:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Reginald Sanders
Hello Nerd1a4i, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Reginald Sanders, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  So Why  21:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Nerd1a4i! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:52, Monday, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Castello (January 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberto Castello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply to edit on Article Yucatec Maya language
Hi! This is in reply to your undoing of a recent edit I made to Yucatec Maya language. The edit I made involved removing the reference to "British Anglo-Saxon". I did this as the term as it appears in the article is not technical. The term does not appear in the source cited and seems to have been originally introduced by the author to clarify the statement made in the initial clause of the sentence. However, the term "British Anglo-Saxon" has no linguistic meaning as "British" refers to a group of languages belonging to the Celtic language family and "Anglo-Saxon" refers to a specific Germanic language (an ancestor to our modern English). Combining the two produces a non-sense term which cannot be used in the manner the author seems to want to use it. My suggestion is that the final clause in this sentence be removed avoid any confusion or misinformation introduced by the presence of the phrase "British Anglo-Saxon". 209.6.204.215 (talk) 03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Jalowiczor has been accepted
 Peter Jalowiczor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Please restore the article 'vOICe' as it was previously
Hi! I saw that you edited the article 'vOICe' but did not post any comment. After you, NewYorkActuary declined the submission. I am irritated by the entire submission ordeal. Please restore the article to its previous version to the form it was in when I edited last. I will not further submit the article for review, but keep it as my notes. I don't possess the expertise to restore my article to its earlier version. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Bkpsusmitaa, please stop editing your post - it keeps showing up in one's notifications box, and it is rather annoying. I have read your message; see the talk page of Draft:vOICe for my response to your help request and also this message. Thank you. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Stub category
Please don't add Category:Stubs manually as you did here: it just confuses things. The stub templates add the appropriate categories automatically. Thanks. Pam D  09:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Jalowiczor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Jalowiczor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Jalowiczor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

my edits to Peter Jalowiczor
Hi I wanted to inform you that I have edited the research section in Peter Jalowiczor. I discuss my rationale on the article's talk page. Given my vote to redirect the article, I have also posted a disclaimer on the AfD discussion page announcing the fact that I made significant edits to the article. In my judgment, these edits retained the critical information about his research and organized them more logically, but I would be pleased to discuss them with you if you disagree. Best, Astro4686 (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Helm (author) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard Helm (author), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International Documentary Film Festival CRONOGRAF


Hello, Nerd1a4i. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "International Documentary Film Festival CRONOGRAF".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted
Hello Nerd1a4i. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 19:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

Why I was nominated for quick deletion that he is a famous journalist
Why I was nominated for quick deletion that he is a famous journalistNader mohamed, author and authoritative sources Khaledsalah (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Khaledsalah, you haven't included sources or an explanation of why he is a famous journalist. I would suggest you read Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please also note that the nomination of your article for quick deletion isn't any reflection on you - it's hard creating a new article! Besides reading the notability guidelines, you could also try creating the article using the Article Wizard, which helps guide you through the process. More experienced editors will also review your work and offer you advice. When it's ready, you can submit it, and it will be incorporated into the article mainspace. I hope this helps. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 00:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Excellent speech brother, there are no sources to talk about him and he worked for interview with Martin Tamk and De sources I wrote about him and the sources to work as a journalist  Khaledsalah (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Khaledsalah excuse me, I meant to say there weren't sufficient sources, not that there were no sources. You're right, there are some, but there need to be more. And it isn't just about the number of the sources; that's only one aspect of the problem. Again, please read through the notability guidelines. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 00:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

I want to fix the article because I followed in its creation Khaledsalah (talk) 00:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

And I want to remove the announcement of the quick deletion of the article to fix the article please help not to delete the articleKhaledsalah (talk) 00:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC) I want your attendee to remove the quick deletion notice that exists in the article to avoid deleting it and I will modify the page on my brother and I hope to help you with the approval of the article with reliable sources of famous sites and large and there are interviews with famous people and the pages on Wikipedia and Belmsadar my brother means Chloe KamelKhaledsalah (talk) 00:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Stub sorting
Please don't use the stub if you can find a more specific stub type. This script plus "control/command F" can help out. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  04:58, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I see that you've used stub since I've posted this message. If you have difficulty stub sorting, please tell me. I might be able to help, or if I can't help, I can at least be understanding; however, this requires some level of communication on your part. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  00:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * yes, I apologize. I'm having trouble stub sorting, and a couple of times it's just gone out my head. I'll keep the list of stub categorizations up to remind me. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Totally understandable! -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @  01:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Deprod: Zachary Toth
Hello, I have deprodded Zachary Toth, as the author has made a good faith objection to deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion of this article, feel free to nominate it at AFD. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Good afternoon, Nerd1a4i, implore you to assist me in retaining the zachary toth article, or recommending edits to have the afd tag removed, as I have backed up statements of my long career of scienctific research with the appropriate citation links to Google School, PubMed and their journal entries withing JAMA psychiatry & MRI. Please advise, Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharyrtoth (talk • contribs) 21:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Zacharyrtoth, you can post your arguments at the article's AfD page here, but I'd ask that you first read WP:ACADEMICS, WP:COI, and WP:Too soon. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Please reply and help
Morning Afternoon: Nerd1a4i Why the article has been marked by a nomination and delete it is provided with explanations about personal and there are all reliable sources, please help and reply Nader mohamed I want to approve the page and what is missing outKhaledsalah (talk) 03:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roberto Castello


Hello, Nerd1a4i. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roberto Castello".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Lowe


Hello, Nerd1a4i. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Lowe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jorge Sahade concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jorge Sahade, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Shankar)
Hi, I'm Steve Quinn. Nerd1a4i, thanks for creating Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Shankar)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello. I appreciate creating this page Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Shankar). However, I am unable to find any scholarly reviews or any other reviews. These would support notability for this book. I will give this a few days, then I will be glad to "draftify" this article, which means placing it in a draft space at WP:AFC; or else it will surely go to WP:AFD. Hopefully this will be OK with you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Steve Quinn (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

thanks! I've edited to fix it up as per WP:NBOOK: "The book is, or has been, the subject of instruction at two or more schools, colleges, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country." I know that there's more out there on it - it's a well known text - but I started with that for now. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (54-40 or Fight (book)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 54-40 or Fight (book), Nerd1a4i!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Your sources need more complete bibliographic details. Is 'Delbert Wylder, Emerson Hough (1981)' a book, a journal article, or what?"

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CD Choice Music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Puja and Farabee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girazmach Nadew Wereta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NGC 507, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Dreyer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:NGC 588 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NGC 588, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Sahade has been accepted
 Jorge Sahade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  15:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jorge_Sahade help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

High school (North America)
Hello. I see you've tagged High school (North America) for multiple issues. It seems to me to be a decent start at a page on a missing topic, above the usual standard of most recently added content. Please could you help us to improve the article, perhaps by spelling out any specific concerns on the talk page? Thanks, Certes (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Computing and Quantum Information (book) has been accepted
 Quantum Computing and Quantum Information (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Galobtter (talkó tuó  mió) 17:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Quantum_Computing_and_Quantum_Information_(book) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Please reply and help
Morning Afternoon: Nerd1a4i Why the article has been marked by a nomination and delete it is provided with explanations about personal and there are all reliable sources, please help and reply Nader mohamed I want to approve the page and what is missing outKhaledsalah (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Lowe


Hello, Nerd1a4i. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Lowe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NGC 588


Hello, Nerd1a4i. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NGC 588".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 18:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)