User talk:Nerflight

Regarding edits made during July 15 2007 to Graffiti
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Shell babelfish 02:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thansk for your error...seeing as everything on the graffiti article came str8 from the first graffiti artist in atlanta.....i guess the first graffiti artist in atl is not considered a reliable source for info on the atl graffiti movement then huh....yea your a idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerflight (talk • contribs)

Regarding additions about the "Paleo-Hebrew door eye"
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. אמר Steve Caruso 03:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * oh yea....someone took out whta I typed...which was historically correct info...then I put my info back....it's ok for my stuff to get editted out by someone...but not ok for me to reedit them out.  yea..your a idiot.  maybe you should also learn paleo-hebrew. go back to school idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerflight (talk • contribs)


 * Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Additionally, please adhere to Wikipedia's policy on no personal attacks and be sure to sign all of your comments on talk pages (it would probably be best for you to take a quick glance over all of Wikipedia's Policies before you continue contributing to avoid future frustration). It is also considered improper to remove warning templates from your talk page and blank other peoples' comments.


 * For the record I've actually studied Paleo Hebrew and by trade I'm a professional Aramaic translator. Academically, the "door eye" hypothesis has no merit and Google has not heard of it outside of your edits to Wikipedia that were propagated to its mirrors. Please be more considerate with your actions next time and cite reliable sources. אמר Steve Caruso 18:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)