User talk:Nero81

Your edits to Clarence House, Richmond
As I explained when I previously reverted your edit, the citation you provided for the sale price is unreliable as an encyclopaedia source, as estate agents' pages are soon deleted and do not provide long-term links. If you wish to contest this, please first discuss the matter on the article's Talk page. Headhitter (talk) 17:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Headhitter (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)