User talk:Nesukier

Speedy deletion of Magician Dor
A tag has been placed on Magician Dor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ejay (talk) 09:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making single character articles of Xanth characters
Nesikier...A long time ago, I merged all the information I could into a handful of multi-character lists. Please do not keep creating these individual articles. And if you are going to make images for the characters, get them right. Iris has dark black hair and Bink is plain looking. I am going to look at all of the single character articles that have been done. I think one has already been put up for speedy deletion, which may be the right move. These characters have no importance outside of the Xanth series. I don't think that individual character articles is the right way to go. And I love the Xanth series, I just don't want to go to crazy with it here. - LA @ 23:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Have you looked at how much is out there about Harry Potter and Avatar the Last Airbender outside of their original media? They are in the news, there are a lot of outside and verifiable information on them. Unfortunately, the Xanth characters don't have that. If the film is ever made, Bink may then deserve an article, but that is iffy. Yes, Xanth is a popular series, but not enough to get mentioned in the news or on a notable enough site. The information could be kept on the list, and the individual articles deleted through the AfD process, unless they qualify for a speedy delete.
 * Oh, one small thing to make life a bit easier when using templates. Not all of them need to be substituted. When I saw the articles with the Xanth template in the Xanth templates category, I checked and noticed that in each article you substituted the template. That template was not meant to be substituted, all you need to type is Xanth at the end of a Xanth article and presto, its there. :)
 * I know how it can be when an article you invested time and energy into comes under attack. I have had it happen over and over again. At least I am someone who actually knows about the series and not some random person who loves to tag articles with those big annoying boxes. What I can do is reintegrate the information back into the lists and AfD the individual character articles, before someone who doesn't know what Xanth is about does.
 * If these characters ever make it into a serious publication or three, then maybe they should have articles. But let's wait until then, okay? - LA @ 00:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Magician Bink has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco5 21:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Magician Trent constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  aka john lennon  21:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sorceress Iris. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Magicians of Xanth. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  aka john lennon  22:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Sorceress Iris for deletion
The article Sorceress Iris is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sorceress Iris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

File:M.Dolph.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M.Dolph.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Magician Dor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magician Dor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Magician Dor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 02:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Magician Bink for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magician Bink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Magician Bink until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Magician Trent for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magician Trent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Magician Trent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 14:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sorceress Ivy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorceress Ivy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sorceress Ivy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sorceress Irene for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorceress Irene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sorceress Irene until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)