User talk:Net Sprite

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at political family. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop. Vjmlhds 19:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Note: The above user, Vjmlhds, has a pattern of deleting warnings from other users from their page, as well as preforming disruptive editing. This "Warning" will remain so that any interested parties can easily access the evidence of my claims.

The Opinion against: Most politicians include their family in campaigning, transition teams, and into administrations. What separates a Political Family (or Dynasty) from the average politically active family are the offices themselves. Advisory positions do not hold the weight of cabinet positions, executive positions such as Mayoral office, nor judicial occupations like being a Federal Judge. Vjmlhds has refused this line of thinking and preferred to cast an overly broad net around a very specific group so that, in essence, any politician that has included their family within any form of internal office position (which would include Campaign Managers - which are a private and non-governmental but wholly political position) designates that politician and their family as part of a Political Dynasty. Vjmlhds's counter-point is that JFK appointed his close relation to the AG position. There is a clear difference in both scope, responsibility, and authority between a strictly advisory position and one such as a cabinet level position. Another counter-argument against my position or reasoning for clarifying and pruning the information set forth by the page was that I was showing "anti-Trump bias". Donald Trump's presidency, ethics, morals, and policy stances have not been apart of my arguments. It seems to me that Vjmlhds really sees a virtue in being labelled as a Political Family and therefore desires to see the Trump family labelled as such.