User talk:NetanelBacharSchwartz

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fickett-Jacobs cycle has been accepted
 Fickett-Jacobs cycle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fickett-Jacobs_cycle help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Better references
I've accepted Fickett-Jacobs cycle, but I'd recommend that you go back and fix up the reference formatting to conform to the style described in WP:CITE. Doing so will make this much more useful to readers. In particular, annotating each reference with a WP:DOI would be extremely useful, as these are indexed by all the major scientific literature databases. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)