User talk:Nether Animal

Sourcing, and welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, Nether Animal. In seeing your edits to the Eye color article, I need to point you to WP:Sourcing and advise you not to remove reliably sourced content unless you provide a good reason for doing so (either in your edit summary on or the talk page). I see that you are new to editing Wikipedia...at least under this user name. Thus, I give you this list in order to help your editing here at Wikipedia:


 * 1) What Wikipedia is not, which summarizes what belongs in Wikipedia and what does not;
 * 2) Neutral point of view, which describes Wikipedia's mandatory core approach to neutral, unbiased article-writing;
 * 3) No original research, which prohibits the use of Wikipedia to publish personal views and original research of editors and defines Wikipedia's role as an encyclopedia of existing recognized knowledge;
 * 4) Verifiability, which explains that it must be possible for readers to verify all content against credible external sources (following the guidance in the Risk disclaimer that is linked-to at the bottom of every article);
 * 5) Reliable sources, which explains what factors determine whether a source is acceptable;
 * 6) Citing sources, which describes the manner of citing sources so that readers can verify content for themselves; and
 * 7) Manual of Style, which offers a style guide—in general editors tend to acquire knowledge of appropriate writing styles and detailed formatting over time.

These are often abbreviated to WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:MOS respectively.

Also, you need to always sign your comments when "talking" on Wikipedia talk pages. To sign your comments, all you have to do is type four tildes beside them.

Take care, and welcome to Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I replied on my talk page. And on Wikipedia...new comments should typically be placed below older comments. Flyer22 (talk) 08:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Michael Stifel‎
You gave no reason for your removal of the copyright violation notice on Michael Stifel‎. Please do not remove such a notice without proof that there has been no such copyright violation, they are taken very seriously by Wikipedia and the foundation running it. Dmcq (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)