User talk:Netking cn

June 2008
The recent edit you made to East Asia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 09:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to East Asia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again (Evidence), you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 10:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You've been blocked for disruptive editing. That includes edit warring and POV-pushing on the China-related articles, against the established consensus. When your block expires, discuss on the talk pages before making such changes you clearly know will be controversial. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 11:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * While you are blocked, you are still able to edit your talk page. If you have comments, you can post them here. Edit warring to push a particular point of view is not acceptable. Especially so for potentially controversial changes. Please discuss proposed changes on the relevant talk pages, instead of unilaterally making changes which you clearly know will not be unanimously supported. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)