User talk:Netra Nahar

Welcome!

 * } Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

STQA and AI
Name : Netra Nahar College : COE ,Pune Mentor : Mr. Pradeep Waychal


 * Grey box testing
 * Data Mining and AI

Welcome
Hello, Netra Nahar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Edits on Data Mining
Hi, Sorry, I had to revert your edits to that article. There were just too many things wrong with them.

First of all, the whole section is largely redundant to the article. Most of what you state is on data mining itself, already discussed in the article. (Including that AI techniques are being used there). For example, there is a whole section on "notable uses". And when you claim that "knowledge representation" is a "fundamental AI technique used in data mining", you clearly should provide sources that this is actually an AI technique and not well, a "more fundamental technique used in AI and data mining".

Then e.g. "AI is a wider area than machine learning" - shouldn't this then be on the machine learning page?

Secondly, they were just not properly wikipedia formatted.

Sorry. Did you actually read the whole data mining article before adding your things? I mean, it was already all there as far as I can tell. Don't try to rewrite the article inside-out! I guess the same applies to your changes on Software testing - you essentially just added things that were already there. Please treat an article as a whole; it doesn't benefit from containing the same statements multiple times. Thank you. --Chire (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:AI Data Mining.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AI Data Mining.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Sign in before editing
Please do not forget to log in before making any edits.I have already mentioned this on the course page.Do take care henceforth. :) Pratik Lahoti (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your Editor Review
Hi there Netra, I just want to let you know that I've removed your Editor Review request because you've made so few edits and it's rather hard to review someone without more to go on. However, if you have any specific questions, my talk page is open. :)  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  13:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Start working on your STQA Article....
Hey, there is too little time left for you to work on your article, so it would be better if you pull up your socks and start. If you have any problem regarding writing article or references or notability etc., please go to the Help Center or drop me a message on my talkpage. Start soon !!!! Cheers !!! Wasim Mogal (talk) 19:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Namaskaram!
Namaskar from your OA! I am here to help you remotely with any queries and help that you may need! Please do not hesitate to get in touch with me! Tkx Shoba rayirath (talk) 05:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC);

Copyright violations
''' DO NOT COPY TEXT FROM OTHER WEBPAGES UNLESS YOU HAVE THE EXPLICIT PERMISSION TO DO SO! '''

Please do not remove the copyvio template from articles. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing.

--138.246.2.177 (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 *  DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE EITHER! --138.246.2.177 (talk) 07:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Using information from sources to avoid copyright problems
Hello, and welcome. :) While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, I'd like to speak to you a little bit about the way we incorporate information from sources on Wikipedia. You may also wish to read Copy-paste. First and foremost, you cannot ever copy or translate content to Wikipedia without following certain steps, based on the copyright status of the original. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page or, certainly, to reach out to your campus ambassador. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If you can prove that the content is public domain, you can copy/translate as much of it as you like, but you have to acknowledge what you are doing to avoid plagiarism. Plagiarism contains some instructions for that. Being published on the internet does not make content public domain; most of the material we find on the internet or in books is copyrighted. Public domain offers some more information on how to tell if something is public domain. If you can't prove it's public domain, you should assume it isn't.
 * If the content is not public domain but is compatibly licensed, you can copy/translate as much of it as you like, but you have to comply with the terms of the license to avoid copyright infringement and you have to acknowledge what you are doing to avoid plagiarism. Plagiarism contains suggestions for both of those, and when you are copying from another Wikipedia project or article (as these are not public domain), you can find the steps in Copying within Wikipedia. We can't assume that content is compatibly licensed unless it says that it is.
 * If the content is neither public domain nor compatibly licensed, you can only copy/translate a small amount, and you must mark this as a direct quotation with quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text".
 * Otherwise, you must put all information you find in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. You have to make sure not to follow the sources too closely. See Close paraphrasing. Following too closely can create a derivative work, so it is not permitted here. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. There is a really good college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, here.


 * Please note you cannot post copyright material anywhere on Wikipedia including user page drafts. On User:Netra Nahar/Gray Box Testing, you currently have huge chunks pasted from http://thetestingcrowd.com/the-agile-tester/let-us-know-all-about-gray-box-testing/ and probably other sites as well. Please remove it immediately. Apart from the copyright issues, pasting in someone else's text and then trying to change a few words is the worst possible way to write an article. It almost always results in Close paraphrasing which is also a copyright infringement. If the paraphrasing is done without any real understanding of the original source, it can also result in a garbled, out-of-context, confusing text. Voceditenore (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Artificial Intelligence in Data Mining


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Artificial Intelligence in Data Mining. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Data mining. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Data mining - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Important – Please read
I have just blanked User:Netra Nahar/Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining. You have re-posted there all the material which had been deleted as copyright violation from Artificial Intelligence in Data Mining. See this. Once again, you cannot post copyright material anywhere on Wikipedia. You must stop this. Voceditenore (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Attention !!!!
Hi Netra, As I have told you earlier, you cannot copy-paste the content from anywhere and make it a part of your article. You are doing serious copyvios from many days, and the admins have been repeatedly informing you about the same. I have also told earlier to get your content checked from your teacher or any of the CA's. Write the content in your sandbox and get it checked....DO NOT UPLOAD THE DATA WITHOUT GETTING IT REVIEWED. I got your message regarding reviewing your article, I am out of town so didn't reply but you can also approach any other CA or OA or your teacher. Make sure you take precautions and do not engage in any more copyvios or YOU MAY GET BLOCKED. WRITE IN YOUR SANDBOX ONLY. CHEERS Wasim Mogal (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It's OK to write in a sandbox, but it is NOT OK to put copyright material there, as you had done. Voceditenore (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Your addition to User:Netra Nahar/Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Your draft
Hello Netra. I had a look at your draft (User:Netra Nahar/Gray Box Testing). I can confirm that the copyright problems are now addressed, but the subject is not my area at all. So I've left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science if someone there could advise you on whether the new content is suitable. Best wishesVoceditenore (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Important
I have once again removed a huge chunk from your draft, User:Netra Nahar/Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining, which you had copied from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.42.1071&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Please do not do this, Netra. We have explained to you many times that you may not paste copyright material anywhere on Wikipedia, including user drafts. Not ever. Not even if you plan to remove it later. All versions of any page are accessible to the public via the history and none of them should contain copyright material. Keep all the sources you are using off Wikipedia. If you are still having trouble understanding this, please contact me or your Campus Ambassador. Voceditenore (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Editor Review
I am currently cleaning up the backlog over at Editor Review and I found this in the backlog. As it is no longer posted on the main page at Editor Review, I was wondering if I should remove it from the backlogs and put it to rest or if I should repost it for community review. I will remove it from the backlogs three days from now if I am not given a response.— cyberpower Offline Happy 2013 22:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)