User talk:Network-nonsense

June 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ecological stability, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 01:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The section is from a very recent paper and was added to three other wikis with identical information, most likely from the authors. The authors in question (Barzel) also has a track record of publishing work that is fundamentally flawed leading to scathing rebuttals both in journals and on prominent blogs. For instance :
 * "Silence on the relevant literature and errors in implementation" in Nature Biotechnology pointing out so many issues
 * nature link https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3185 pdf http://www.sontaglab.org/FTPDIR/bastiaens_et_al_kholodenko_about_barabasi_nature_biotech2015.pdf
 * or here another comment in PRL about Barzel paper
 * https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.088901
 * ... I could go on Network-nonsense (talk) 00:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Lourdes 11:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.