User talk:Neuralnewt

August 2018
25px|alt=Information icon Hello, I'm Usernamekiran (AWB). I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Help desk— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. — usernamekiran (talk)  14:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * , I would like to appeal this.
 * I wanted to clarify my initial question by saying that I was using the Wikipedia Beta app. Neuralnewt (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I apologise. I havent changed your second edit. The first one looked like you were advertising/spamming an app. I apologise again. See you around :) — usernamekiran (talk)  14:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I apologise. I havent changed your second edit. The first one looked like you were advertising/spamming an app. I apologise again. See you around :) — usernamekiran (talk)  14:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * No problem! I hope my new edit looks less intrusive. Sorry about the confusion.
 * Neuralnewt (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margaret Mead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAAS ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Margaret_Mead check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Margaret_Mead?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

August 2019 incident
The first lesson is that it's probably bad form to open a conversation |belittling another editor on their talk page. If nothing else, users generally have the right to blank conversations on their talk page, which gets in the way of other parties discussing things.

As for how to respond to vandalism, read WP:VANDAL. Also, you should install Twinkle, a plugin that gives you access to a whole bunch of features, including a library of warnings and notices that you can give. Read up on a template before using it, the names aren't always that descriptive and they may have very specific use cases.

In this case, it wasn't really clear to me whether the edits were intentionally bad, so I went with the lowest warning level,. If they continue making similarly disruptive edits, then someone else will slap another warning on them. If they really don't quit it, they'll get reported to an admin and banned or blocked (different things). I wouldn't recommend following an editor around on new edits, it invites a a battleground mentality where they think you're bullying them, and can lead to you getting personally invested in getting them banned (a bad look, which can also lead to bad decisions). signed,Rosguill talk 06:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thank you for this message! I could feel that I wasn't handling it very well, I was a little worked up after seeing that this editor has included self-promotional links to his personal instagram, changed 'school' to 'asylum', and reverted edits of other people who corrected his vandalism among other things. I will make sure to follow the best practice with the warning notices instead expressing personal frustrations moving forward. Neuralnewt (talk) 12:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neurergus kaiseri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)