User talk:Neuro

Archives: 2004: 2004-12-29

Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision
Hey, you endorsed the RfC on Everyking, and you probably know it's gone to arbitration. Some of us feel that the proposed decision against Everyking is insufficient and too weak for a user who has abused Wikipedia so badly. I hope you can weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Everyking/Proposed decision having read the proposed decision and discussion and share your opinion with us, whether it's that the decision is too strong, just right, or too weak. Just because you weren't involved as deeply as some of us shouldn't prevent you from sharing your opinion. Johnleemk | Talk 06:17, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

About the Fiat Croma
You said: "why all the non-breaking space entities in Fiat Croma?"
 * In case of line breaks, the number will remain associated with the respective measurement unit in the same line. It's in the style guides. --Pc13 11:15, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mirror Clarification
I moved your "clarification" page to User:Neuropedia/Mirror Clarification from the Template: namespace (was at Template:User:Neuropedia:Mirror Clarification). You can keep it, or request its deletion, but I think we can agree it's not going to be a "General use" template. -- Netoholic @ 01:02, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC)

New Fiat Punto: the sources say joint GM/Fiat platform
You have updated the Fiat Punto article with information on the Mark 3, codeveloped by Fiat and Opel, but other GM-related articles like GM Gamma platform and Opel Corsa state that GM DAT is responsible for the next Corsa platform; I believe this was contributed by User:Sfoskett. I've found lot of links that confirm your information, but I can't find anything regarding GM DAT's responsibility of building new Corsa platform. Should we resolve this issue in Talk:GM_Gamma_platform or maybe somewhere else? --DmitryKo 23:02, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Duplicate Fiat Seicento
Even as it is, it's pictures and the rest of the data is al in the Fiat area, and formatted really well ... if's it's just part of a migration project fine, but as it stands it's a duplicate orphan. -- Dbroadwell 00:06, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I've been scouring the orphans relentlessly and am a bit happy go ~stomp~ at the moment. Since it really is part of a work in progress and not lost and forlorn, Great! -- Dbroadwell 02:58, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Battlestar Galactica Season one
Well.. i am wondering, if someone is yet bussy with writing a wikipage about the recently aired miniseries on Skyone in the uk (which is also available on DVD since the end of march) And as you edited a lot on the battlestar 2003 series, you might know :) (also i am not an english native speaker, so... you would get some buggy english in an article and we can't have that ofcourse) --Letatcest 10:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Button Menu
Hey, just wanted to let you know I modified and used User:Neuropedia/Buttons for the basis of my own User Page (now at http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:RossKoepke/Newpage - soon to be at http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:RossKoepke ). It still looks very similar to yours on the surface, but the code has been completely revamped. You might actually want to take a look at the code, it's much more browser-friendly to browsers like Opera and IE. --Ross KoepkeTalk

CHU
See Changing_username/Usurpations — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 02:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Username
Hi there! I am currently at editor review, and Townlake brought up a valid point, which is that for all of my time editing with this signature I had not checked whether this account existed and was active. Whilst my signature is easily distinguishable from yours, Townlake brought up a valid point about confusion. I'm not really sure what I'm saying here, I guess I just figured that I should note to you that I have been using this signature for a while now, which could ease any confusion that may occur if we get mistaken for one-another (although so far the coast would appear to be clear, judging by the lack of talk page messages). I am sort of attached to this signature, and would be highly reluctant to change it - that is the only reason I am not changing it, it has been my signature for a good while now, and people know me by it. Again, not entirely sure what I'm trying to convey with this message, just figured I shouldn't let it lie. Thanks, and here's hoping you're having a good day. :) &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 15:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, interesting. Not sure why you used a truncation of your username in your signature, but that's your call I guess!  Perhaps reciprocal disclaimers on each other's User pages?  (Neuro|Neurolysis) is not (Neurolysis|Neuro)?  Or perhaps you can think of a better way (if needed) to distinguish each other?  :)
 * I'm happy to do that, and will do so now. :) (sorry I didn't reply earlier, seems I forgot to watchlist this) — neuro  (talk) (review) 00:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorted :) &mdash;Neuro (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Lad culture/AfD
Thanks for the mindful, polite note about my edit to Lad culture. I removed the AfD tag, expanding on my reasons in the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnavarro (talk • contribs) 22:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Characters on The West Wing
Template:Characters on The West Wing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Toby Ziegler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toby Ziegler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Toby Ziegler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 15:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lumison logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Lumison logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lumison logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Lumison logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)