User talk:Neurofish

August 2009
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * You have not provided a reason for unblocking. –xenotalk 18:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

This is my original account. What is the disruption I caused to justify these draconian actions? There was no vandalism. Literaturegeek claims I vandalized a page, but in fact I updated a reference to a more recent journal article and removed biased text, see the talk page. Neurofish (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Neurofish

How could I abuse mutliple accounts if there was no abuse? None of the admins is looking into the fundamental issues involved, they are just dismissing my requests without bothering to look into the issues. They find the first reason to decline my request and run with it. The evidence submitted by Literageek just refers to vandalism.Neurofish (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Neurofish
 * Unfortunately, your editing pattern is very similar to that of a user who has been blocked, and not very much like the pattern of a brand new user. Now that your request has been reviewed three times, in my opinion, you've had sufficient reviews of your request. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)