User talk:NeuronMaster

June 2015
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Alex Jones (radio host) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Note re this and this: Wikipedia reports what relevant sources say—see wp:NOTCENSORED. If you have a problem with that, you should go to the article talk page and discuss, as opposed to continue reverting—see wp:BRD and wp:3RR. - DVdm (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DVdm (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

DVdm,

Repeated attempts were made to edit the terms "conspiracy theory" "conspiracy" and like terminology from The term "conspiracy theory" and all similes, are a form of derogatory belittlement. It is unfair to label any one or anything with the term "conspiracy theory" as it stifles and dismisses new ideas. The use of the term on this page to describe an individual, even if non primary source articles use it. Is very inappropriate and even offensive. It is a shame that Wikipedia is defending a mind shuttering term in reference to an idea or person who doesn't hold common beliefs. In this article the article states "The Guidestones have become a subject of interest for conspiracy theorists." Then goes on to name Mark Dice. Was it the intention for Wikipedia to defame Mr. Dice's work? The use of the word "conspiracy" is no longer it's traditional definition, a group of conspirators as "gay" means happy. According to Wikipedia it's self states "... that the skepticism of conspiracy theorizing (the generation of conspiracy theories) is akin to a modern day superstition". In the context of how these terms were used in the article and in the defamatory articles supporting them...they were used as verbal weapons. I hope to see this resolved on the lowest level possible. My next step it to write the corporate office about this situation and if these terms are still being used, well I guess I won't be donating my money to Wikipedia anymore.

NeuronMaster (talk) 19:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)NeuronMaster
 * You may want to read this Talk:Alex_Jones_%28radio_host%29/Archive_8 . Wikipedia works by WP:CONSENSUS -  Cwobeel   (talk)  20:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Indeed, NeuronMaster, do have a look at that RFC on the archived talk page. You are free to go to the current article talk page and re-open the discussion in order to establish a new consensus. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Suggestions of legal action
You appear to be suggesting that some edits could result in legal action and thus should not be made. Before you do this again, would you please read WP:NLT as legal threats usually end up with the editor blocked until the matter is resolved. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

NeuronMaster, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure