User talk:Neutral123

re Usana
Please do not revert, or otherwise remove content from, the above article without discussing the proposed changes on the talk pages. I have reviewed your contributions, and note that they are only in editing this article - today - and you therefore may not be familiar with Wikipedia editing principles and practices. The introduction of an article should include the most important and relevant information regarding its subject; and in the case of Usana that it is a leading food supplement provider and that there is some controversy over its method of selling and some claims by senior officers. The body of the article should then expand and explain both the claim for it being a leading provider, and also the nature of the controversies. This article has been carefully constructed between various editors with differing viewpoints, and with input by an neutral administrator (which is me). It has also been subject to vandalism, often from USANA related ip addresses and mostly pro-USANA (which usually means removing material likely to appear non beneficial to USANA) with some anti-USANA edits thrown in.

If you wish to discuss your proposed changes, please do so on the talk page provided. If you continue to edit against consensus you will be reverted as a vandal, and if you continue you will be reported to uninvolved admins with a view to having you blocked from editing until you conduct yourself appropriately. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)