User talk:NeutralBosnian

Welcome!
Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the discussions in Talk:Bosniaks. However, I hope you aren't offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Bosniaks is a controversial article with often heated discussions. It's best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not. --Ronz 18:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. --Ronz 20:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Please respond here to the concerns above. Thanks! --Ronz 20:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I dispute your neutrality and integrity since you've repeatedly tried to reverse or rejected all possible non Serb/Russian oppinions as wrong or inappropriate. I'm simply providing a balanced interpretation of the Balcans issues, and please don't try the standard Serb line where Serb soldiers were the victims in Srebrenica.NeutralBosnian 23:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF. Personalizing disputes in this way will get you no where. --Ronz 23:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed your copying your above comment to my user page per WP:TALK and WP:HARASS. I suggest that if you're serious, you take your complaints to WP:WQA. In the future, if you want to discuss something directly with me, please use my talk page. --Ronz 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of material from Talk:Bosniaks
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Ronz 17:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz 17:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * See Administrators' noticeboard/3RR --Ronz 18:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I've given up reasoning with you, as you are vandalising and spamming on purpose and are a contributor to the edit war.NeutralBosnian 18:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Your addition to WP:3O
Hey. I've removed your text from the third opinion page, and instead added it to the talk page itself. The 3O page is only for listings, not discussion. Please keep the discussion to the talk page, and someone will come by soon and help with the discussion. Thanks. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  [ t &#183; c ] 19:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Stifle (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert
Your concern about User:Ronz was examined and considered. I didn't see any evidence presented of incivility on his part. I'd like you to read Assume good faith, which is a fundamental policy of Wikipedia. Also, I believe a read-through of ad hominem would be helpful. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Bosnian pyramids‎
Thanks for the link you added to Bosnian pyramids‎. I moved it to a list of possible references that is being maintained on the article talk page here Talk:Bosnian_pyramids. It's an old press release (May'06) that I don't believe introduces anything not already covered in the article. However, I believe that Dr. Barakata (Dr. Barakat?) recently released a report. I looked for an English version a while ago, but never found one. Perhaps one is available today, or at least some good press coverage of it? --Ronz (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Srebrenica massacre
NB, instead of engaging in an edit war (WP:3RR) on the Srebrenica massacre (see your edits below) I suggest that we ask for some 3rd party opinions on this matter. Could you set up a Request for Mediation (WP:RFM). Osli73 (talk) 14:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13:19, 7 December 2007
 * 12:17, 7 December 2007
 * 00:02, 7 December 2007
 * 11:24, 6 December 2007
 * 10:16, 4 December 2007
 * 14:44, 3 December 2007
 * 14:20, 3 December 2007

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of banned user BosnianHolocaustSurvior. Stifle (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)