User talk:Neutrinos on the Prairie

Did I do this correctly?
Still figuring this out. Kmkbooks (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Kmkbooks (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Kmkbooks (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Did I do this correctly?
I know you did yours very well! Sofyamarm (talk) 21:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It looks right to me! --Neutrinos on the Prairie (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Donald J. Summers


The article Donald J. Summers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "While accomplished, not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the heads up about this article. I've added some additional information about Summers's role in a significant experiment called E-516 from a book about the history of the lab where that experiment took place. Summers's role is covered in both an article from Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences about the experiment string that E-516 was part of ("Megascience in Particle Physics: The Birth of an Experiment String at Fermilab," which was already cited in the article) and that book about the history of the lab (Fermilab: Physics, the Frontier, and Megascience, which is a new source for the article). I'm not sure if that additional coverage is enough to demonstrate his notability, so I have not removed the deletion proposal and I am looking for other coverage of his contributions. Thanks, Neutrinos on the Prairie (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Donald J. Summers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald J. Summers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Donald J. Summers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Bonnie Fleming moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bonnie Fleming, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 09:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for your comments and suggestions. Could you give me a more specific sense of what would need to be done to address these issues? I believed that Fleming did meet the criteria for notability, primarily based on the coverage she has received in secondary sources like The New York Times, 1400 Degrees, and Symmetry Magazine for her leadership roles in prominent physics experiments and of her status as only the second woman to gain tenure in the Yale Physics Department. This assessment was based on my understanding of Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and what I learned in the APS Wiki Scientist course run by the Wiki Education Foundation, which focused on creating Wikipedia pages covering the contributions of women in physics. I also compared Fleming to these other physicists with successful Wikipedia pages, and it seemed to me that Fleming had a similar level of coverage in secondary sources and prominence in her field: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Aprile, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Silverstein, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%A9line_B%C5%93hm
 * I would like to address these issues so Fleming’s page can be successfully reviewed and included in Wikipedia. I have reviewed the notability guidelines and compared the Fleming page to the existing pages for similar people, but I am still uncertain which elements of the Fleming page are causing the problem. Could you point out some things in the Fleming page that are not in line with the successful Wikipedia pages so I can work on correcting them? Or what information was not appropriately referenced so I can remove it or find a proper reference for it? Thanks, and I appreciate the assistance. Neutrinos on the Prairie (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonnie Fleming has been accepted
 Bonnie Fleming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bonnie_Fleming help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 07:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)