User talk:Neutroinfo

Your edits at Foundation for a Drug-Free World
Re: your edits over at Foundation for a Drug-Free World

Wikipedia relies on the use on secondary reliable sources. If you are in any doubt what constitutes a primary source have a look here: sources. Also please familiarise yourself with what we mean by 'reliable' and editing with a neutral point of view. If these are your first edits as suggested by your history I would suggest editing some less contentious topics, maybe trying The Wikipedia Adventure and If you have any questions please feel free to ask in the Teahouse Thanks. Mramoeba (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Please do not attempt to rewrite Foundation for a Drug-Free World to whitewash it by removing the existing reliable sources. If you disagree with the tone of the article, please start a discussion about the issues on the article's talk page. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * You are now engaged in a practice called edit warring wherein you insist on your version of the article despite the objections of other users. This behavior is not acceptable, and if it continues, it will get you blocked. Please open a discussion at the talk page, as previously recommended. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Foundation for a Drug-Free World shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mramoeba (talk) 16:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)