User talk:NeverStopEvolving

Welcome!
Hello, NeverStopEvolving, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Wolbochia Infections in Drosophila simulans References
Wolbochia Infections in Drosophila simulans References

"Naturally-occurring Wolbachia infection in Drosophila simulans that does not cause cytoplasmic incompatibility" http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=ad7e461b-b677-4291-b8b3-7ded4e93aaa6%40sessionmgr4001&crlhashurl=login.aspx%253fdirect%253dtrue%2526profile%253dehost%2526scope%253dsite%2526authtype%253dcrawler%2526jrnl%253d0018067X%2526AN%253d11854557&hid=4202&vid=0

"Evolution of single and double Wolbachia symbioses during speciation in the Drosophila simulans complex" http://www.pnas.org/content/92/14/6389.full.pdf

"Variation in Antiviral Protection Mediated by Different Wolbachia Strains in Drosophila simulans" http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1000656

"The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia wRi strain infecting Drosophila simulans" http://www.pnas.org/content/106/14/5725.full

NeverStopEvolving (talk) 14:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You should move this to your species' talk page so more users can view and comment. Also, are there any popsci or online resources you could use for your article? Something on Wolbachia in general?Evol&#38;Glass (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This one sounds good. "Evolution of single and double Wolbachia symbioses during speciation in the Drosophila simulans complex" You should do your annotation on it. Gern Blanston 13 (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Drosophila simulans, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Drosophila simulans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Per your email, see User:NeverStopEvolving/D. simulans. Pay careful attention to the edit summaries I added. If you apply this to the rest of the article, and add a bit about the description, you should (a) improve the article a lot, and (b) have a much better chance of your edits sticking. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ctenophorus pictus
Please note that this article was first created using Australian English, and this is the preferred form per MOS:ENGVAR and MOS:TIES. I've reverted your spelling changes to match the rest of the article. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 04:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Drosophila simulans page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=692044681 your edit] caused a duplicate page number error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F692044681%7CDrosophila simulans%5D%5D Ask for help])