User talk:Neverlose72

Potential libel
I insist that you immediately refrain from inserting potentially libelous criminal accusations into Wikipedia articles without proper authentication. Please provide reliable sources for all claims of unlawful behaviour. FCYTravis 20:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle to express or promote grievances with other people. I respect that you may have a disagreement with someone, but Wikipedia is not the proper place to pursue that. We are an encyclopedia. Thank you. FCYTravis 20:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * To converse with other editors, you may use your talk page here. Simply click "Edit this page" and write your post, as you would on a normal article.
 * The issue here is that the edit you made makes an allegation of criminal conduct, which is clear and present actionable libel if it's not true. The source you cited is a forum post by an aggrieved party, and that is not a reliable source. We need to have independent, unbiased references - such as a newspaper article, television news report or magazine piece - reporting on the allegations before we may make mention of them. For legal and ethical reasons, Wikipedia requires the highest standards of sourcing for anything included in a biography of a living person. This is an established policy which protects the encyclopedia from libel lawsuits and prevents it from being used as a scandal sheet. At this time, there are no reliable sources reporting on the controversy, therefore Wikipedia cannot include mention of it. These conditions aren't negotiable, I'm afraid. FCYTravis 21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)