User talk:Neverneutral

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Dekisugi (talk) 12:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

9/11 Truth Movement
You seem to feel that the article should be called something else instead. You can't just redirect. For some reason, it appears the page cannot simply be moved. If you want, you can request that an admin do it for you at Requested moves. User: (talk • contribs • count) 12:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please see my previous post about how to move an article. User: (talk • contribs • count) 12:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move," and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Dekisugi (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 9/11 denial
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheBilly (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh get real. If '9/11 denial' is -attack- against some who quite plainly persist in denying historical facts and/or circumstances surrounding 9/11, Holocaust denial is an -attack- against certain other people who persistingly deny certain other things about people who died in World War 2. But it's not. They're both not. And your haste to quick-suppress it for that reason is quite unholy. So now we have the verdict of Wikipedia: 911-denial does not exist! or alternatively it's not-notable!! Great. Except the it DOES exist and because of the outspokenness of some its bottomfeeding proponents it's not so ignorable. I wonder how many of the 9/11 dead or their surviving family members would feel validated by the fact that 9/11 denial as a subject is too touchy to be aknowledged as being real on the internet's supposed number 1 worldwide most comprehensive reference site? Neverneutral (talk)

The block was placed by. Jehochman Talk 15:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)