User talk:NewFan123

Nomination of Borthwick Street (TV Series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borthwick Street (TV Series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Borthwick Street (TV Series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyros1972 Talk 10:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Borthwick Street (Season 1)
Hello NewFan123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Borthwick Street (Season 1) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Borthwick Street (Season 2)
Hello NewFan123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Borthwick Street (Season 2) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Borthwick Street (TV Series)


A tag has been placed on Borthwick Street (TV Series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''it was previously speedily deleted at AfD per G3 as a hoax. This version is a bit different, so G4 likely doesn't apply, but the underlying problem (G3) hasn't gone anywhere''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sideways713 (talk) 09:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Do not reintroduce hoax pages
I'm giving you one warning. Do not reintroduce pages such as Borthwick Street (TV Series). There is nothing to back up that this show exists even as a conceptual idea and is seen as a hoax. If you reintroduce this page, it will only be deleted again as a hoax and you will run the risk of having your account permanently blocked from editing on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Borthwick Street (TV Series)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Borthwick Street (TV Series), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop
Based on your user page, Borthwick Street is the name of your YouTube series. This is not a topic that merits inclusion on Wikipedia, unless it is one of the top most popular web series on YouTube, in which case it should fall to someone other than yourself to create the article about it. Do not reintroduce the article again, or you will likely be blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Considering that this is all they've done and they've reintroduced it to the point where it's been salted, I'm blocking them as a promotional SPA. I don't see where this is actually the YT vid per se, as nothing comes up in a search. Either he's introducing hoaxes or he's creating pages for something that is clearly not notable in an attempt to promote it. He's been asked to stop already with this warning and hasn't- I think we've given him enough of a chance, given that this is his only purpose for being here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   15:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are valid reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.