User talk:NewYorkWinter2022

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stephen Lett have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stephen Lett was changed by NewYorkWinter2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909379 on 2022-01-01T15:05:33+00:00

Hello, I'm I Am Chaos. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stephen Lett without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stephen Lett. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Stang  15:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.  Stang  15:34, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Stephen Lett shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Removing an article when the introduction begins with one person being a member of the Governing Body and one of Jehovah's Witnesses makes the whole article misleading. But I see that you have corrected the introduction yourself, feel free to call my contribution vandalism. Or just call it correction. NewYorkWinter2022 (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)