User talk:NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999

April 2015
Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mexico City International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 01:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to American Airlines. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Citydude1017 (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not add unreferenced information to the American Airlines articles. Your edits have been reversed until you supply references. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to American Airlines Group because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - Ascetic Rosé   16:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to America's Next Top Model (cycle 6)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, America's Next Top Model (cycle 6), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 11:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

February 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 4); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Please stop inserting your WP:Original research into the article. Your changes need to be backed up with reliable sources. Other wikis are WP:UGS and are therefore not reliable.'' Nihlus  19:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Original research
Please stop making unsourced changes to RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 4). Contestants are only listed as HIGH or LOW if they are clearly designated that by the judges. It is not open to your interpretation of how they performed. Nihlus 02:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Mass editing RuPaul's Drag Race season pages
Please cease your mass editing of season pages of RuPaul's Drag Race. Your edits go against the current consensus and will be reverted. If you continue to edit without taking it to a talk page for community discussion may be seen as disruptive editing or even edit warring. Continuing this behaviour may lead to warnings and possibly a loss or restriction of editing privileges. Brocicle (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please stop changing articles en masse when there is an established consensus to how the articles should appear. Nihlus  00:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11), you may be blocked from editing. Umimmak (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bearcat (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing on all season pages of RuPaul's Drag Race. Your edits go against a previously agreed consensus and should be discussed via the talk page before adding. Attempts will be promptly reverted until you discuss possible changes and failing to do so may result in a loss of editing privileges for failing to adhere to consensus and disruptive editing. Brocicle (talk) 02:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ''Stop adding names that were removed via consensus at this RfC. I will ask that you be blocked if you continue.'' Nihlus  15:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Your recent editing history at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woody (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

High/Low/Safe
Given your involvement in editing the Season 12 article, particularly the High/Low/Safe issue, your involvement in the discussion at the project talk page would be very welcome. Woody (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Woody (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Season 12
Please explain where the consensus was for this edit? Did I miss the discussion on either the talk page or the ongoing discussion on the WikiProject page about this very issue. Woody (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , there is none. It's just continued disruption by NewYorkYankees that has gone on for years. Nihlus  21:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This edit is not a consensus nor a discussion. I would strongly suggest that you self-revert and gain consensus for your edits before editing the article. As your statement was article specific, it would have been best made on the article talk page. Please sign your talk page posts. Woody (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Final Warning
You have continued to edit after my request for a comment above so I have no option but to give you a clear final warning: If you continue to edit disruptively and fail to get a consensus for your edits you will be blocked indefinitely. You have been blocked twice for edit warring over the same issue over a period of over a year. There has been no change over that year despite numerous warnings. Wikipedia works by editors reaching a consensus on whether content meets the core content policies. You have continually failed to engage in discussion about content despite numerous requests, edit notices and hidden comments in the article to do so. I repeat: if you continue to make disruptive edits to contentious material without comment or consensus you will be blocked indefinitely. Woody (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , where did you obtain consensus to make these edits?       Nihlus  20:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
Following my warning above you have continued to edit the RuPaul Drag Race articles to change the status of material that you know is contentious (eg    ). You have been blocked twice over a period of a year for edit warring over the same issue yet you continue to change their status and edit war without any discussion. Wikipedia works by editors reaching a consensus on whether content meets the core content policies. There is an active discussion over this issue that you have been told about many times yet you have not engaged in. As such:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you continue to edit disruptively. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

If you are able to show that you are able and willing to engage in consensus building and edit IAW Wikipedia's core policies then you may request to be unblocked using the code shown above. Woody (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)