User talk:New Basti user

Welcome
Hello New Basti user and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 14:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)-- VViking Talk Edits 14:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.-- VViking Talk Edits 14:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Editorializing
Your edits at Recurring deposit have been reverted because they represent your opinion of the value of this mechanism, which is not the point of Wikipedia. You may state that certain recognized experts (name them) have recognized recurring deposits as an excellent means of investment, if you can cite the source where said recognized expert made such a claim, but you cannot simply add the opinion on your own without sourcing. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyrights
You may not copy text verbatim from other sources, as you did in this edit to Recurring deposit, where you added text from [https://www.bankofbaroda.in/blogdetail.htm?28#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20recurring%20deposit%20account%3F,is%20called%20a%20recurring%20deposit. this source].

I am extremely sorry for this mistake I know that Wikipedia is not a copy-paste website and I will not repeat this stupidity anymore of cheating contents from other sources and pasting them as mine. Sorry once again. New Basti user (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)