User talk:New identity

Thomas Begley 29 January 2007
Since you have changed you user name you have made edits to the above pages which are not what has been discussed on the talk page. Also your comments could be construed as being in breach of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA, if you as unsure way please familiarise yourself with there policies. Regards--Vintagekits 18:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Breaking WP:3RR
Please be aware that you are in danger of breaking WP:3RR on a number of pages.--Vintagekits 01:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Y'all needs a userpage
Steal mine, I don't care. But yuo need something. ~  Flame vip  e  r  Who's a Peach? 01:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPA
I've just had a quick look at this situation and I've only got as far as your edit summaries, some of which are blatant and provocative personal attacks on User:Vintagekits, which must stop forthwith or they will be stopped by your being blocked. This is quite unacceptable. I don't want an explanation on my talk page thanks. I just want to see civility. If you can't do that, then don't edit the same articles as him. Tyrenius 01:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

User:New identity
If you would like your user-page deleted/turned back to a red-link, then place db-user and a admin will be by shortly to oblige. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 04:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Wrong
er dude, it was decided you could keep your old username. pschemp | talk 06:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

The end of the mediation cabal on the term Volunteer is ending in two days.
The mediation process is ending in two days - you have two days to have you final say and 1. Show any proof that Volunteer is a rank and 2. Leave your final vote in coming to a consensus here. Thank you. --Vintagekits 22:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)