User talk:Newjerseyson

Speedy deletion nomination of Perspicuous Media Corporation
Hello Newjerseyson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Perspicuous Media Corporation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. GoldenRing (talk) 03:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Perspicuous Media Corporation


A tag has been placed on Perspicuous Media Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 146.85.97.76 (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Advice
Please read WP:CORP, and also WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. WP:COI (conflict of interest) could be a good idea too. And finally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Peridon (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)