User talk:Newseditor76

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rklawton 22:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

These links will give you a better idea regarding how to more appropriately edit articles. If you continue along the path you are currently on, you'll end up finding your account blocked from editing. See also point of view style editing. Rklawton 22:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Brown
I see you are spending a lot of time on the matter of A. Brown in the Daily Kos. Why? It doesn't appear to be especially notable. It exists. But lots of stuff exists. It's dumb, but a lot of that stuff exists too. With one exception, this particular entry never became a news item. If you step back from it for a moment, the whole thing looks like a publicity stunt that went flat. That is, it looks like Brown wanted to generate a lot of attention to get his career back in gear, and American media has soundly and roundly ignored him. We should do the same - not for any political reason - but rather because this particular blog entry just doesn't appear to have generated any buzz. By including it in articles, you're basically helping Brown to accomplish his goal - to gain attention. However, Wikipedia's notability guidelines are pretty clear that we don't publish stuff that hasn't already gained attention. Rklawton 04:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Шизомби (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

November 2011
Don't just restore stuff when a reason was given for its removal. Don't do that again, please. Gimmetoo (talk) 00:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I did not see what reason was given. What was the reason given? Thank you.
 * In the edit summary, which you would see when you "undo" an edit. This content was denied. Articles don't generally have text about false rumours except in unusual cases, and I don't think this is one. If you do, then make a case on the talk page of the article for including a mention. Gimmetoo (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I'll do that as soon as I can. But right now it has not been confirmed or denied that the rumor is false. I think it's good that we put it in since many people, including myself, came to the wiki page to find out if there were any new developments. Thanks for the help.